A modification to the Walch classification of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis using three-dimensional imaging

被引:230
作者
Bercik, Michael J. [1 ]
Kruse, Kevin, II [2 ]
Yalizis, Matthew
Gauci, Marc-Olivier [3 ]
Chaoui, Jean [4 ]
Walch, Gilles [5 ]
机构
[1] Lancaster Orthoped Grp, 231 Granite Run Dr, Lancaster, PA 17601 USA
[2] Texas Orthopaed Associates, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Pasteur 2 Hosp, Univ Inst Locomot & Sports, Dept Orthopaed & Sport Surg, Nice, France
[4] Telecom Bretagne, Plouzane, France
[5] Ctr Orthoped Santy, Lyon, France
关键词
Shoulder; arthroplasty; reverse arthroplasty; Walch classification; glenoid; idiopathic arthritis; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; VERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2016.03.010
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Since Walch and colleagues originally classified glenoid morphology in the setting of glenohumeral osteoarthritis, several authors have reported varying levels of interobserver and intraobserver reliability. We propose several modifications to the Walch classification that we hypothesize will increase interobserver and intraobserver reliability. Methods: We propose the addition of the B3 and D glenoids and a more precise definition of the A2 glenoid. The B3 glenoid is monoconcave and worn preferentially in its posterior aspect, leading to pathologic retroversion of at least 15 degrees or subluxation of 70%, or both. The D glenoid is defined by glenoid anteversion or anterior humeral head subluxation. The A2 glenoid has a line connecting the anterior and posterior native glenoid rims that transects the humeral head. Using 3-dimensional computed tomography glenoid reconstructions, 3 evaluators used the original Walch classification and the modified Walch classification to classify 129 nonconsecutive glenoids on 4 separate occasions. Reliabilities were assessed by calculating. coefficients. Results: Interobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.391 (indicating fair agreement) using the original classification to an average of 0.703 (substantial agreement) using the modified classification. Intraobserver reliabilities improved from an average of 0.605 (moderate agreement) to an average of 0.882 (nearly perfect agreement). Conclusion: When 3-dimensional glenoid reconstructions and the modified Walch classification described herein are used, improved interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities are obtained. (C) 2016 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1601 / 1606
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Comparison of standard two-dimensional and three-dimensional corrected glenoid version measurements
    Budge, Matthew D.
    Lewis, Gregory S.
    Schaefer, Eric
    Coquia, Stephanie
    Flemming, Donald J.
    Armstrong, April D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2011, 20 (04) : 577 - 583
  • [2] Glenoid resurfacing: What are the limits to asymmetric reaming for posterior erosion?
    Clavert, Philippe
    Millett, Peter J.
    Warner, Jon J. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (06) : 843 - 848
  • [3] Comparison of glenoid inclination angle using different clinical imaging modalities
    Daggett, Matthew
    Werner, Birgit
    Gauci, Marc Olivier
    Chaoui, Jean
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2016, 25 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [4] THE USE OF COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF GLENOID VERSION
    FRIEDMAN, RJ
    HAWTHORNE, KB
    GENEZ, BM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (07) : 1032 - 1037
  • [5] Static posterior humeral head subluxation and total shoulder arthroplasty
    Gerber, Christian
    Costouros, John G.
    Sukthankar, Atut
    Fucentese, Sandro F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (04) : 505 - 510
  • [6] Gillespie R, 2009, ORTHOPEDICS, V31, P21
  • [7] Ho Jason C, 2013, J Bone Joint Surg Am, V95, pe82, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.L.00336
  • [8] Three-Dimensional Imaging and Templating Improve Glenoid Implant Positioning
    Iannotti, Joseph P.
    Weiner, Scott
    Rodriguez, Eric
    Subhas, Naveen
    Patterson, Thomas E.
    Jun, Bong Jae
    Ricchetti, Eric T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 97A (08) : 651 - 658
  • [9] Effect of glenoid deformity on glenoid component placement in primary shoulder arthroplasty
    Iannotti, Joseph P.
    Greeson, Clay
    Downing, Devin
    Sabesan, Vani
    Bryan, Jason A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [10] Humeral Head Posterior Subluxation on CT Scan: Validation and Comparison of 2 Methods of Measurement
    Kidder, Jacob F.
    Rouleau, Dominique M.
    Pons-Villanueva, Juan
    Dynamidis, Savvas
    DeFranco, Michael J.
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 11 (03) : 72 - 76