Determining the key capabilities required for performance excellence in higher education

被引:26
作者
Asif, Muhammad [1 ]
Searcy, Cory [2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Sultan Univ, Coll Business Adm, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] Ryerson Univ, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
capabilities; performance excellence; higher education; analytic hierarchy process; knowledge creation; operational excellence; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; INDICATORS; TQM; EXPLOITATION; ENVIRONMENTS; EXPLORATION; MODEL; VIEW;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2013.807676
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Performance excellence in higher education institutions (HEIs) requires the management of the capabilities related to research, programme design and delivery, and service performance. The capabilities that relate to these three dimensions of HE are numerous, but the resources required to manage these capabilities are usually limited. The key capabilities required for performance excellence must be determined as a part of systematic management. Mapping out the key capabilities, however, is not easy given the unique context of each HEI and subjective perceptions of those involved in determining the key capabilities. This article provides a structured framework for mapping out the key capabilities - required for performance excellence - through the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The framework allows the integration of diverse viewpoints, is consensus-based, and allows input to, and ownership of, the decision-making process and its outcomes. The application of AHP is demonstrated through a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 35
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Dynamic capabilities through continuous improvement infrastructure [J].
Anand, Gopesh ;
Ward, Peter T. ;
Tatikonda, Mohan V. ;
Schilling, David A. .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2009, 27 (06) :444-461
[2]   Developing measures for performance excellence: is the Baldrige criteria sufficient for performance excellence in higher education? [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
Raouf, Abdul ;
Searcy, Cory .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (06) :3095-3111
[3]   Setting the course for quality assurance in higher education [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
Raouf, Abdul .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (04) :2009-2024
[4]   A model for total quality management in higher education [J].
Asif, Muhammad ;
Awan, Muhammad Usman ;
Khan, Muhammad Khalid ;
Ahmad, Niaz .
QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2013, 47 (04) :1883-1904
[5]  
Badri M.A., 2004, INT J EDUC MANAG, V18, P224, DOI [DOI 10.1108/09513540410538813, 10.1108/09513540410538813]
[6]   THE USE AND ABUSE OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS IN UK HIGHER-EDUCATION [J].
BALL, R ;
WILKINSON, R .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 27 (04) :417-427
[7]   FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE [J].
BARNEY, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) :99-120
[8]   An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in Turkish higher education [J].
Bayraktar, Erkan ;
Tatoglu, Ekrem ;
Zaim, Selim .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2008, 19 (06) :551-574
[9]   Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited [J].
Benner, MJ ;
Tushman, ML .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2003, 28 (02) :238-256
[10]   Developing performance indicators for assessing classroom teaching practices and student learning: The case of engineering [J].
Cabrera, AF ;
Colbeck, CL ;
Terenzini, PT .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2001, 42 (03) :327-352