Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

被引:14
|
作者
Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah [1 ]
Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem [2 ]
Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed [1 ]
El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria [1 ]
Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, 165 El Horeya Rd, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Surg Intens Care, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Erector spinae plane block; Ultrasound guided; Analgesia; Spread; and Breast cancer surgery; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Methods Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Standard volume ESPB), or with 40 ml 0.125% bupivacaine (High volume ESPB), or no ESPB (GA only group). The primary outcome was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 12 hours after surgery. P-values < 0.05 were considered the cutoff point for statistical significance. The secondary outcomes were pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the VAS, craniocaudal injectate spread, to paravertebral (PV) and epidural spaces assessed by CT, clinical dermatomal spread, level of sedation or agitation, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia and analgesia. Results VAS at rest 12 h after surgery was less in both intervention groups compared to the control (1.75 +/- 0.79 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.88 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.96, p = 0.001). The LA had extended further in the high volume group than the standard volume group (11.20 +/- 3.07 vs. 9.15 +/- 2.54 vertebral levels, p = 0.027). No difference of the spread to PV or epidural spaces between the 2 intervention groups. More dermatomes were covered in the high volume group (7.20 +/- 2.12 vs. 5.75 +/- 1.37 dermatomes, p = 0.014). Agitation was higher in the GA only group than both ESPB groups in the first 8 postoperative hours. Patients were more satisfied in both ESPB groups than the GA only group. Conclusions Preoperative ESPB is an excellent analgesic modality and it can also attenuate both postoperative agitation and sedation. Doubling the injectate volume enhances the craniocaudal spreading and may be useful for surgeries requiring multiple dermatomes. However, larger volume has no effect on analgesic efficacy or patient satisfaction as there is no further spread to the PV, epidural spaces or spinal nerve rami.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Analgesia for Patients Undergoing Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Jinaworn, Pongkwan
    Pannangpetch, Patt
    Bunanantanasan, Kamonchanok
    Manomaisantiphap, Siwaporn
    Udomsawaengsup, Suthep
    Thepsoparn, Marvin
    Saeyup, Pipat
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2024, 34 (11) : 4211 - 4219
  • [42] Erector spinae plane block for complete surgical anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia for breast surgeries: A prospective feasibility study of 30 cases
    Malawat, Aman
    Verma, Kalpana
    Jethava, Durga
    Jethava, Dharam D.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 64 (02) : 118 - 124
  • [43] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing open radical prostatectomy: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Dost, Burhan
    Kaya, Cengiz
    Ozdemir, Emine
    Ustun, Yasemin Burcu
    Koksal, Ersin
    Bilgin, Sezgin
    Bostanci, Yakup
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 72
  • [44] A randomized double-blind controlled study comparing erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after breast surgery
    Wittayapairoj, Aumjit
    Sinthuchao, Nattanan
    Somintara, Ongart
    Thincheelong, Viriya
    Somdee, Wilawan
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (04): : 445 - 453
  • [45] The quality of recovery after erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Marcin Wiech
    Paweł Piwowarczyk
    Marcin Mieszkowski
    Bułat Tuyakov
    Karolina Pituch-Sala
    Tomasz Czarnik
    Andrzej Kurylcio
    Mirosław Czuczwar
    Michał Borys
    BMC Anesthesiology, 22
  • [46] Erector spinae plane block versus transversus abdominis plane block with rectus sheath block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomized clinical trial
    Mengke Liu
    Xuan Mo
    Ruonan Zhan
    Han Wang
    Yangxi Zhao
    Yi Zhang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 25 (1)
  • [47] Analgaesic Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Coronary Surgery: A Randomised Controlled Trial
    Disikirik, Akin
    Bilgi, Murat
    Turkoglu, Mustafa
    Ucaroglu, Erhan Renan
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2024, 34 (02): : 129 - 134
  • [48] Ultrasound Guided Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Patient Controlled Analgesia in Open Nephrectomy for Renal Malignancies: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Abdelgalil, Ahmed Salah
    Ahmed, Ahmed Mansour
    Gamal, Reham M.
    Elshal, Mamdouh Mahmoud
    Bakeer, Ahmed Hussein
    Shaker, Ehab Hanafy
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 3093 - 3102
  • [49] Analgesic effect of the bi-level injection erector spinae plane block after breast surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Aksu, Can
    Kus, Alparslan
    Yorukoglu, Hadi Ufuk
    Tor Kilic, Cennet
    Gurkan, Yavuz
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2019, 31 (03): : 132 - 137
  • [50] Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia of adult patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Randomized, controlled trial
    Altiparmak, Basak
    Toker, Melike Korkmaz
    Uysal, Ali Ihsan
    Kuscu, Yagmur
    Demirbilek, Semra Gumus
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2019, 57 : 31 - 36