Analgesia and spread of erector spinae plane block in breast cancer surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

被引:14
|
作者
Abdella, Ahmed Mohamed Mohamed Rabah [1 ]
Arida, Emad Eldin Abd El Monem [2 ]
Megahed, Nagwa Ahmed [1 ]
El-Amrawy, Wessam Zakaria [1 ]
Mohamed, Walid Mohamed Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Management, 165 El Horeya Rd, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Univ Alexandria, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesia & Surg Intens Care, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Univ Alexandria, Med Res Inst, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Alexandria, Egypt
关键词
Erector spinae plane block; Ultrasound guided; Analgesia; Spread; and Breast cancer surgery; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-022-01860-w
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). Methods Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Standard volume ESPB), or with 40 ml 0.125% bupivacaine (High volume ESPB), or no ESPB (GA only group). The primary outcome was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 12 hours after surgery. P-values < 0.05 were considered the cutoff point for statistical significance. The secondary outcomes were pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the VAS, craniocaudal injectate spread, to paravertebral (PV) and epidural spaces assessed by CT, clinical dermatomal spread, level of sedation or agitation, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia and analgesia. Results VAS at rest 12 h after surgery was less in both intervention groups compared to the control (1.75 +/- 0.79 vs. 1.6 +/- 0.88 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.96, p = 0.001). The LA had extended further in the high volume group than the standard volume group (11.20 +/- 3.07 vs. 9.15 +/- 2.54 vertebral levels, p = 0.027). No difference of the spread to PV or epidural spaces between the 2 intervention groups. More dermatomes were covered in the high volume group (7.20 +/- 2.12 vs. 5.75 +/- 1.37 dermatomes, p = 0.014). Agitation was higher in the GA only group than both ESPB groups in the first 8 postoperative hours. Patients were more satisfied in both ESPB groups than the GA only group. Conclusions Preoperative ESPB is an excellent analgesic modality and it can also attenuate both postoperative agitation and sedation. Doubling the injectate volume enhances the craniocaudal spreading and may be useful for surgeries requiring multiple dermatomes. However, larger volume has no effect on analgesic efficacy or patient satisfaction as there is no further spread to the PV, epidural spaces or spinal nerve rami.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Erector spinae plane block combined with local infiltration analgesia for total hip arthroplasty: A randomized, placebo controlled, clinical trial
    Lennon, Mark J.
    Isaac, Senthuren
    Currigan, Dale
    O'Leary, Sinead
    Khan, Riaz J. K.
    Fick, Daniel P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 69
  • [32] A pilot randomized-controlled trial evaluating the erector spinae plane block in thoracic and breast surgery
    Uda, Yoshiaki
    Byrne, Kelly
    Brahmbhatt, Anjalee
    Gotmaker, Robert
    Lim, Daniel
    Konishi, Yasutaka
    Eves, Tessa Katherine
    Paxton, Emma
    Barrington, Michael J.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2020, 67 (10): : 1371 - 1380
  • [33] A pilot randomized-controlled trial evaluating the erector spinae plane block in thoracic and breast surgery
    Yoshiaki Uda
    Kelly Byrne
    Anjalee Brahmbhatt
    Robert Gotmaker
    Daniel Lim
    Yasutaka Konishi
    Tessa Katherine Eves
    Emma Paxton
    Michael J. Barrington
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2020, 67 : 1371 - 1380
  • [34] Ropivacaine with Dexmedetomidine or Dexamethasone in a Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Combined with an Erector Spinae Plane Block for Thoracoscopic Lobectomy Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yang, Jing
    Zhao, Min
    Zhang, Xiao-Rui
    Wang, Xiao-Rui
    Wang, Zhi-Hao
    Feng, Xiao-Yue
    Lei, Ya-Juan
    Zhang, Jian-Wen
    DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2022, 16 : 1561 - 1571
  • [35] Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block for Quality of Recovery in Bariatric Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
    Toprak, Hatice
    Basaran, Betul
    Toprak, Sukru S.
    Et, Tayfun
    Kumru, Nuh
    Korkusuz, Muhammet
    Bilge, Aysegul
    Yarimoglu, Rafet
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 (09) : 2640 - 2651
  • [36] Erector spinae plane block vs. single shot epidural block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Abdelhamid, Hebatallah Salah
    ElSabbagh, Hala Ahmed
    Amin, Shereen Mostafa
    Abdelhakeem, Amr K.
    ANAESTHESIA PAIN & INTENSIVE CARE, 2022, 26 (03) : 310 - 317
  • [37] Analgesic effect of erector spinae plane block after cesarean section: A randomized controlled trial
    Dostbil, A.
    Ince, I.
    Altinpulluk, E. Y.
    Perez, M. F.
    Peksoz, U.
    Cimilli, G.
    Kasali, K.
    Atalay, C.
    Ozmen, O.
    Sahin, T.
    Yilmaz, E.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2023, 26 (02) : 153 - 161
  • [38] Pectoserratus plane block versus erector spinae plane block for postoperative opioid consumption and acute and chronic pain after breast cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial
    Genc, Caner
    Kaya, Cengiz
    Bilgin, Sezgin
    Dost, Burhan
    Ustun, Yasemin Burcu
    Koksal, Ersin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2022, 79
  • [39] Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion: A randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Qingfen
    Wu, Yaqing
    Ren, Fei
    Zhang, Xizhe
    Feng, Yi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 68
  • [40] Quadratus lumborum and erector spinae plane blocks are effective for analgesia in laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial
    Baran, O.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 27 (23) : 11323 - 11333