Does population aging reduce environmental pressures from urbanization in 156 countries?

被引:41
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaowei [1 ,3 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Petr East China, Inst Energy Econ & Policy, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Population aging; Threshold panel regression; Nonlinear model; Ecological environment; CARBON EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PER-CAPITA; IMPACT; CONSUMPTION; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157330
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urbanization and population aging are key indicators of human-related social attributes. With economic progress and urban development, human living conditions and the level of medical and health care have been continuously improved. Population aging has become a global trend, which brings serious challenges to the world. Environmental sustainability is closely linked to both urbanization and aging. Most of the existing studies only focus on the linear relationship between urbanization and the environment, and the effect of aging on the ecological environment is also controversial. It is of great significance to conduct systematic research on urbanization-aging-environment. This paper aims to reconstruct the linear relationship between urbanization and the environment, investigating the nonlinear effect of population aging on the nexus of urbanization-environment in 156 countries. This paper focuses on exploring ways to improve environmental quality from the perspective of population aging. To this end, the panel threshold regression models of urbanization-carbon emissions and urbanization-ecological footprint are developed respectively. In which, urbanization is set as the explanatory variable, carbon emissions and ecological footprint are set as the explained variables, and population aging is set as the threshold variable. This paper divides four income groups according to the income standard of the World Bank, and regresses the panel data of the global and four income groups respectively to reflect the comprehensiveness of this work. The results show that there is a threshold effect of population aging on the nexus of urbanization-carbon emissions/ecological footprint both the global scale and different income groups. On a global scale, urbanization has a positive effect on carbon emissions and ecological footprint. When aging crosses the threshold in turn, the promotion effect of urbanization on carbon emissions gradually becomes smaller, and the influence coefficient of urbanization on the ecological footprint shows an inverted U-shaped change trend. Aging can reduce the environmental pressures related to urbanization. There is heterogeneity in the nonlinear regression results for different income groups. Population aging variable in high income group, upper middle income group helps to improve environmental quality. In lower middle income countries and low income countries, aging slightly increases the coefficients of urbanization and ecological footprint.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Does population aging matter for remittances in developing countries?
    Kim, Jounghyeon
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2023, 80 : 1038 - 1056
  • [22] Does the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hold for Coal Consumption? Evidence from South and East Asian Countries
    Shahzad, Qaisar
    Aruga, Kentaka
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [23] Does nuclear energy reduce consumption-based carbon emissions: The role of environmental taxes and trade globalization in highest carbon emitting countries
    Mehboob, Muhammad Yasir
    Ma, Benjiang
    Sadiq, Muhammad
    Zhang, Yunsheng
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 56 (01) : 180 - 188
  • [24] Dynamic nexus between transportation, urbanization, economic growth and environmental pollution in ASEAN countries: does environmental regulations matter?
    Huang, Shi-Zheng
    Sadiq, Muhammad
    Chien, Fengsheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (15) : 42813 - 42828
  • [25] Do natural resources, urbanization, and value-adding manufacturing affect environmental quality? Evidence from the top ten manufacturing countries
    Khan, Irfan
    Hou, Fujun
    Le, Hoang Phong
    Ali, Syed Ahtsham
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 72
  • [26] Does environmental pollution reduce residents' income? Evidence from CFPS in China
    Xu, Zhihua
    Sun, Jiao
    Qin, Ying
    Xu, Juan
    Li, Shuqin
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 189
  • [27] Does environmental sustainability attract foreign investment? Evidence from developing countries
    Opoku, Eric Evans Osei
    Acheampong, Alex O.
    Dzator, Janet
    Kufuor, Nana Kwabena
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 31 (07) : 3542 - 3573
  • [28] Does Multidimensional Urbanization Help Reduce Environmental Pollution?-Evidence from Three Major Urban Agglomerations in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wei, Lijie
    Cheng, Yu
    Wang, Zhibao
    Pan, Zhilong
    Qi, Guangzhi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [29] Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: Does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution?
    Neves, Sonia Almeida
    Marques, Antonio Cardoso
    Patricio, Margarida
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2020, 68 : 114 - 125
  • [30] The Environmental Effects of Urbanization, Education, and Green Innovation in the Union for Mediterranean Countries: Evidence from Quantile Regression Model
    Latief, Rashid
    Sattar, Usman
    Javeed, Sohail Ahmad
    Gull, Ammar Ali
    Pei, Yingshun
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (15)