Does population aging reduce environmental pressures from urbanization in 156 countries?

被引:41
作者
Wang, Qiang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xiaowei [1 ,3 ]
Li, Rongrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Urumqi 830046, Xinjiang, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Petr East China, Inst Energy Econ & Policy, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Population aging; Threshold panel regression; Nonlinear model; Ecological environment; CARBON EMISSIONS; CO2; EMISSIONS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; DYNAMIC RELATIONSHIP; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; PER-CAPITA; IMPACT; CONSUMPTION; MATTER;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157330
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urbanization and population aging are key indicators of human-related social attributes. With economic progress and urban development, human living conditions and the level of medical and health care have been continuously improved. Population aging has become a global trend, which brings serious challenges to the world. Environmental sustainability is closely linked to both urbanization and aging. Most of the existing studies only focus on the linear relationship between urbanization and the environment, and the effect of aging on the ecological environment is also controversial. It is of great significance to conduct systematic research on urbanization-aging-environment. This paper aims to reconstruct the linear relationship between urbanization and the environment, investigating the nonlinear effect of population aging on the nexus of urbanization-environment in 156 countries. This paper focuses on exploring ways to improve environmental quality from the perspective of population aging. To this end, the panel threshold regression models of urbanization-carbon emissions and urbanization-ecological footprint are developed respectively. In which, urbanization is set as the explanatory variable, carbon emissions and ecological footprint are set as the explained variables, and population aging is set as the threshold variable. This paper divides four income groups according to the income standard of the World Bank, and regresses the panel data of the global and four income groups respectively to reflect the comprehensiveness of this work. The results show that there is a threshold effect of population aging on the nexus of urbanization-carbon emissions/ecological footprint both the global scale and different income groups. On a global scale, urbanization has a positive effect on carbon emissions and ecological footprint. When aging crosses the threshold in turn, the promotion effect of urbanization on carbon emissions gradually becomes smaller, and the influence coefficient of urbanization on the ecological footprint shows an inverted U-shaped change trend. Aging can reduce the environmental pressures related to urbanization. There is heterogeneity in the nonlinear regression results for different income groups. Population aging variable in high income group, upper middle income group helps to improve environmental quality. In lower middle income countries and low income countries, aging slightly increases the coefficients of urbanization and ecological footprint.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Does green innovation reduce environmental degradation? A panel threshold analysis for BRICS countries
    Geng, Biao
    Yuan, Guojun
    Wu, Daoning
    Khalid, Samia
    Mahmood, Hamid
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (12)
  • [2] Does tourism promote or reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from major tourist arrival countries
    Wang, Chien-Ming
    Wu, Tsung-Pao
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (03) : 3334 - 3355
  • [3] Does official development assistance alleviate the environmental pressures during the urbanization of recipient countries? Evidence from the sub-Saharan Africa countries
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Li, Rongrong
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2022, 95
  • [4] Impact of energy and industrial structure on environmental quality and urbanization: evidence from a panel of BRICS countries
    Jiang, Jikun
    Zhu, Shenglai
    Gao, Shuning
    Aslam, Bilal
    Wang, Weihao
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (53) : 114183 - 114200
  • [5] Does renewable energy improve environmental quality? Evidence from RECAI countries
    Raghutla, Chandrashekar
    Kolati, Yeliyya
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (45) : 100717 - 100730
  • [6] The effect of institutions and urbanization on environmental quality: evidence from the Belt and Road Initiative countries using dynamic panel models
    Hu, Ziyu
    Khan, Hayat
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (24) : 65746 - 65761
  • [7] The nonlinear effects of population aging, industrial structure, and urbanization on carbon emissions: A panel threshold regression analysis of 137 countries
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Lili
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 287
  • [8] Does Technological Innovation Reduce Environmental Degradation? Evidence from China
    Khalid, Tayiba
    Wen, Jun
    Khalid, Momena
    Khalid, Samia
    Zakaria, Muhammad
    Mahmood, Hamid
    INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2023, 34 (03): : 323 - 334
  • [9] Clean energy, population density, urbanization and environmental pollution nexus: Evidence from Bangladesh
    Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur
    Alam, Khosrul
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 172 : 1063 - 1072
  • [10] Does urbanization redefine the environmental Kuznets curve? An empirical analysis of 134 Countries
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Xiaowei
    Li, Rongrong
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 76