Utility of serial Doppler ultrasound scans for the diagnosis of acute rejection in renal allografts

被引:26
作者
Sharma, AK
Rustom, R
Evans, A
Donnolly, D
Brown, MW
Bakran, A
Sells, RA
Hammad, A
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Sir Peter Medawar Transplant Unit, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Royal Liverpool Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Liverpool L69 3BX, Merseyside, England
关键词
duplex scan; intra-renal indices; renal allografts; acute rejection;
D O I
10.1007/s00147-004-0683-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study aims to explore the utility of serial duplex scanning and to compare its results with those of single time-point scans of renal allografts in the diagnosis of acute rejection (AR). A retrospective analysis of 6017 serial duplex scans (mean: 9.8 scans per patient, 5.7 of which were done during the first 10 days) was performed in 614 patients with 462 episodes of AR from 1992-2000. Even in the absence of AR (n=278), there were day-to-day fluctuations in pulsatility index (PI) and resistive index (RI). An increase of >10% in intra-renal indices was noted 0.95 days (mean) before the commencement of treatment for AR (SD 1.3, range 1-6 days). In patients with acute tubular necrosis (ATN), who have high base line indices, sensitivity of single value of PI and RI was 58% (cut-off level 1.8) and 68% (cut-off level 0.8), with specificity of 66% and 56%, respectively. By contrast, a >10% increase over the previous 'best' in PI and RI had a sensitivity of 78% and 60% respectively, and a specificity of 78% and 90%, respectively. Reversal of flow during diastole (n=50) was found to be associated with 22% graft loss within 3 months of transplantation. We can conclude that a considerable overlap between the indices of patients with AR and those with ATN greatly limits the diagnostic yield of duplex scanning. Nonetheless, serial scanning of renal allografts is more likely to herald the need for biopsy in the diagnosis of AR than one-time scanning.
引用
收藏
页码:138 / 144
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY
    ALLEN, KS
    JORKASKY, DK
    ARGER, PH
    VELCHIK, MG
    GRUMBACH, K
    COLEMAN, BG
    MINTZ, MC
    BETSCH, SE
    PERLOFF, LJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) : 371 - 376
  • [2] Usefulness of the resistive index for the evaluation of transplanted kidneys
    Choi, CS
    Lee, S
    Kim, JS
    Lee, YC
    Koo, DJ
    Seo, YL
    Kim, HC
    Yoon, DY
    Yi, JG
    Bae, SH
    Kim, ST
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (07) : 3074 - 3075
  • [3] Renal transplant evaluation with power Doppler sonography
    Hilborn, MD
    Bude, RO
    Murphy, KJ
    Platt, JF
    Rubin, JM
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 : 39 - 42
  • [4] HOLLENBECK M, 1994, CLIN INVESTIGATOR, V72, P609
  • [5] FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF RENAL-TRANSPLANTS BY DUPLEX DOPPLER AND GRAY-SCALE ULTRASOUND
    JANSEN, O
    ROB, PM
    SCHMIDTKE, V
    MARIENHOFF, N
    RINAST, E
    WEISS, HD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [6] DUPLEX DOPPLER SONOGRAPHY IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFTS - THE SIGNIFICANCE OF REVERSED FLOW IN DIASTOLE
    KAVEGGIA, LP
    PERRELLA, RR
    GRANT, EG
    TESSLER, FN
    ROSENTHAL, JT
    WILKINSON, A
    DANOVITCH, GM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (02) : 295 - 298
  • [7] PYRAMIDAL APPEARANCE AND RESISTIVE INDEX - INSENSITIVE AND NONSPECIFIC SONOGRAPHIC INDICATORS OF RENAL-TRANSPLANT REJECTION
    KELCZ, F
    POZNIAK, MA
    PIRSCH, JD
    OBERLY, TD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1990, 155 (03) : 531 - 535
  • [8] Krumme B, 1997, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V8, P813
  • [9] SONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE RENAL-ALLOGRAFT REJECTION AND CYCLOSPORINE NEPHROTOXICITY
    LINKOWSKI, GD
    WARVARIV, V
    FILLY, RA
    VINCENTI, F
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (02) : 291 - 295
  • [10] DOPPLER SPECTRUM ANALYSIS TO DIAGNOSE REJECTION DURING POSTTRANSPLANT ACUTE-RENAL-FAILURE
    MERKUS, JWS
    HOITSMA, AJ
    VANASTEN, WNJC
    KOENE, RAP
    SKOTNICKI, SH
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1994, 58 (05) : 570 - 576