Real-time pharmacokinetics guiding clinical decisions: phase I study of a weekly schedule of liposome with solid encapsulated paclitaxel in patients tumours

被引:28
作者
Soepenberg, O
Sparreboom, A
de Jonge, MJA
Planting, AST
de Heus, G
Loos, WJ
Hartman, CM
Bowden, C
Verweij, J
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, Dr Daniel Den Hoed Canc Ctr, NL-3075 EA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Grp Pfizer Inc, Pharmacia Italia, Nerviano, Italy
关键词
paclitaxel; liposome; drug delivery system; phase I; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2003.11.027
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The purpose of this weekly schedule phase I study of liposome encapsulated paclitaxel (LEP) was to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), the recommended dose (RD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the pharmacokinetic profiles, and to evaluate preliminarily antitumour effects in patients with refractory solid malignancies. LEP was administered as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 45 min once every week for 6 out of 8 weeks. Fourteen patients were treated at doses ranging from 90 to 150 mg/m(2)/week. In one patient, DLT was observed at the dose level of 150 mg/m(2)/week, who received less than 70% of the intended cumulative dose. No cumulative toxicities were observed. Stabilisation of disease for 8 weeks was documented in two patients. The whole blood clearance of total paclitaxel was similar for LEP (15.3+/-8.98 l/h/m(2)) and Taxol(R) (17.5 +/- 3.43 l/h/m(2)), and the extraliposomal to total drug ratio increased rapidly to unity at later sampling time points.. The trial was discontinued upon completion of enrolment of the 150 mg/m(2)/week cohort because an assessment of the pharmacokinetics and clinical data suggested that LEP was unlikely to have any advantages over Taxol(R). It is concluded that this formulation of LEP is unlikely to provide improvements over the taxanes currently in clinical use. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 688
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Brandl M, 2001, Biotechnol Annu Rev, V7, P59, DOI 10.1016/S1387-2656(01)07033-8
  • [2] Brouwer E, 2000, DRUG METAB DISPOS, V28, P1141
  • [3] Cabanes A, 1998, INT J ONCOL, V12, P1035
  • [4] RECENT ADVANCES IN LIPOSOMAL DRUG-DELIVERY SYSTEMS
    CHONN, A
    CULLIS, PR
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1995, 6 (06) : 698 - 708
  • [5] Drummond DC, 1999, PHARMACOL REV, V51, P691
  • [6] Comparative pharmacokineties of unbound paclitaxel during 1-and 3-hour infusions
    Gelderblom, H
    Mross, K
    ten Tije, AJ
    Behringer, D
    Mielke, S
    van Zomeren, DM
    Verweij, J
    Sparreboom, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02) : 574 - 581
  • [7] Phase I study of liposomal vincristine
    Gelmon, KA
    Tolcher, A
    Diab, AR
    Bally, MB
    Embree, L
    Hudon, N
    Dedhar, C
    Ayers, D
    Eisen, A
    Melosky, B
    Burge, C
    Logan, P
    Mayer, LD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (02) : 697 - 705
  • [8] Liposomal cancer chemotherapy: current clinical applications and future prospects
    Harrington, KJ
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON INVESTIGATIONAL DRUGS, 2001, 10 (06) : 1045 - 1061
  • [9] Mechanism-based pharmacokinetic model for paclitaxel
    Henningsson, A
    Karlsson, MO
    Viganò, L
    Gianni, L
    Verweij, J
    Sparreboom, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (20) : 4065 - 4073
  • [10] Phase I and Pharmacologic study of liposomal lurtotecan, NX 211: Urinary excretion predicts hematologic toxicity
    Kehrer, DFS
    Bos, AM
    Verweij, J
    Groen, HJ
    Loos, WJ
    Sparreboom, A
    de Jonge, MJA
    Hamilton, M
    Cameron, T
    de Vries, EGE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) : 1222 - 1231