Improved hybrid algorithms-based MPPT algorithm for PV system operating under severe weather conditions

被引:38
作者
Bataineh, Khaled [1 ]
机构
[1] Jordan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Irbid, Jordan
关键词
photovoltaic power systems; fuzzy control; maximum power point trackers; power generation control; fuzzy logic controller; FLC; partial shading; PV panel; improved hybrid algorithm-based MPPT algorithm; PV system operating; maximum power point tracking algorithms; MPPT hybrid algorithms; incremental conductance; power-voltage characteristics; perturb and observe method; MAXIMUM-POWER-POINT; PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS; TRACKING METHOD; OBSERVE METHOD; ARRAY; PERTURB;
D O I
10.1049/iet-pel.2018.5651
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
This study aims to provide a comparison between several maximum power point tracking (MPPT) algorithms for PV system under severe weather conditions. Two MPPT hybrid algorithms are proposed, namely (a) hybrid combination of fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and the incremental conductance (IC) and (b) MPPT controller integrates FLC and perturb and observe (P&O) method. The two developed hybrid algorithms combined the strength of both P&O, IC with FLC in single framework. MATLAB/Simulink is used to investigate the response of both algorithms. Several weather conditions are simulated: (i) uniform irradiation, (ii) sudden changing, and (iii) partial shading. Under partial shading on PV panel, multi-peaks appear in power-voltage characteristics of the panel. Simulation results showed that ability of FLC to track MPP degrade significantly when testing at weather conditions far from those used for training. Finally, the proposed hybrid algorithms successfully eliminate the previous limitations associated with FLC, IC, and P&O algorithms individually with efficiency exceeds 97%.
引用
收藏
页码:703 / 711
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Improvement in Perturb and Observe Method Using State Flow Approach
    Ahmed, Rana
    Namaane, A.
    M'Sirdi, N. K.
    [J]. MEDITERRANEAN GREEN ENERGY FORUM 2013: PROCEEDINGS OF AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MGEF-13, 2013, 42 : 614 - 623
  • [2] Allataifeh A.A., 2015, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, V6, P1
  • [3] Bataineh K., 2017, INT J POWER ELECT DR, V8, P1327, DOI DOI 10.11591/IJPEDS.V8.I3.PP1327-1334
  • [4] Bataineh K.M., 2012, Smart Grid and Renewable Energy, V3, P139, DOI [10.4236/sgre.2012.32020, DOI 10.4236/SGRE.2012.32020]
  • [5] Maximum power point tracking control techniques: State-of-the-art in photovoltaic applications
    Bhatnagar, Pallavee
    Nema, R. K.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 23 : 224 - 241
  • [6] An intelligent maximum power point tracking method based on extension theory for PV systems
    Chao, Kuei-Hsiang
    Li, Ching-Ju
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (02) : 1050 - 1055
  • [7] Cuia Y, 2012, PROCEDIA ENG, V29, P2583
  • [8] A novel MPPT (maximum power point tracking) algorithm based on a modified genetic algorithm specialized on tracking the global maximum power point in photovoltaic systems affected by partial shading
    Daraban, Stefan
    Petreus, Dorin
    Morel, Cristina
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 74 : 374 - 388
  • [9] Adaptive fuzzy gain scheduling PID controller for maximum power point tracking of photovoltaic system
    Dounis, Anastasios I.
    Kofinas, Panagiotis
    Alafodimos, Constantine
    Tseles, Dimitrios
    [J]. RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2013, 60 : 202 - 214
  • [10] Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques
    Esram, Trishan
    Chapman, Patrick L.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2007, 22 (02) : 439 - 449