Correlation of Arthrodesis Stability with Degree of Joint Fusion on MDCT

被引:35
作者
Dorsey, Michelle L. [1 ]
Liu, Patrick T. [1 ]
Roberts, Catherine C. [1 ]
Kile, Todd A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Radiol, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
[2] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Orthoped, Scottsdale, AZ 85259 USA
关键词
arthrodesis; fusion; MDCT; nonunion; SURGICAL EXPLORATION; CT;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.08.1254
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to correlate clinically determined joint stability with the degree of bone fusion in the ankle or subtalar joint on MDCT examinations after arthrodesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We performed a retrospective review of 42 consecutive MDCT examinations from 29 patients. All patients had previously undergone arthrodesis of their ankle or subtalar joints and had persistent or recurrent hindfoot or ankle pain. Two musculoskeletal radiologists examined in consensus sagittal 2-mm-thick reformatted slices, measuring on each image the length of the joint surface and the length of the fused portion of the joint space. The sum of the lengths of the fused segments on all slices was then divided by the sum of the lengths of the joint surfaces to calculate the fusion ratio. For the standard of reference, the medical records were reviewed and operative reports, diagnostic injections, and physical examinations were used to classify the joints as stable or unstable. RESULTS. Twelve clinically unstable joints had fusion ratios of 0-32.8%, whereas 30 clinically stable joints had fusion ratios of 33.2-100%. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we selected the cutoff level that maximized Youden's index (the sum of sensitivity and specificity). Using a 33% fusion ratio as the lower limit cutoff for joint stability, the sensitivity was 100%; specificity, 100%; and accuracy, 100%. CONCLUSION. After arthrodesis of the ankle or subtalar joint, MDCT scans can be used to determine whether that joint is likely to be stable if > 33% of the joint has visible bone fusion on sagittal MDCT images.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 499
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   CORRELATION OF RADIOLOGIC ASSESSMENT OF LUMBAR SPINE FUSIONS WITH SURGICAL EXPLORATION [J].
BRODSKY, AE ;
KOVALSKY, ES ;
KHALIL, MA .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :S261-S265
[2]   Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard [J].
Carreon, Leah Y. ;
Djurasovic, Mladen ;
Glassman, Steven D. ;
Sailer, Philip .
SPINE, 2007, 32 (08) :892-895
[3]   Isolated subtalar arthrodesis [J].
Easley, ME ;
Trnka, HJ ;
Schon, LC ;
Myerson, MS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (05) :613-624
[4]   Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis - A systematic review of the literature [J].
Haddad, S. L. ;
Coetzee, J. C. ;
Estok, R. ;
Fahrbach, K. ;
Banel, D. ;
Nalysnyk, L. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (09) :1899-1905
[5]   Prospective CT scan evaluation of hindfoot nonunions treated with revision surgery and low-intensity ultrasound stimulation [J].
Jones, CP ;
Coughlin, MJ ;
Shurnas, PS .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 27 (04) :229-235
[6]   MDCT versus digital radiography in the evaluation of bone healing in orthopedic patients [J].
Krestan, Christian R. ;
Noske, Helge ;
Vasilevska, Violeta ;
Weber, Michael ;
Schueller, Gerd ;
Imhof, Herwig ;
Czerny, Christian .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 186 (06) :1754-1760
[7]   FRACTURE NONUNION - CT ASSESSMENT WITH MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTION [J].
KUHLMAN, JE ;
FISHMAN, EK ;
MAGID, D ;
SCOTT, WW ;
BROOKER, AF ;
SIEGELMAN, SS .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (02) :483-488
[8]   LOW-BACK-PAIN AFTER LUMBAR FUSION - SURGICAL AND COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS [J].
LAASONEN, EM ;
SOINI, J .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (02) :210-213
[9]   Orthopedic hardware complications diagnosed with multi-detector row CT [J].
Ohashi, K ;
El-Khoury, GY ;
Bennett, DL ;
Restrepo, JM ;
Berbaum, KS .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (02) :570-577