Crack-growth behavior of epoxy adhesives modified with liquid rubber and cross-linked rubber particles under mode I loading

被引:38
作者
Imanaka, Makoto [1 ]
Motohashi, Satoshi [1 ]
Nishi, Kazuaki [1 ]
Nakamura, Yoshinobu [2 ]
Kimoto, Masaki [3 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ Educ, Dept Technol Educ, Osaka 5828582, Japan
[2] Osaka Inst Technol, Dept Appl Chem, Asahi Ku, Osaka 5358582, Japan
[3] Tech Res Inst Osaka Prefecture, Mat Technol Div, Izumi Ku, Osaka 5941157, Japan
关键词
A; Epoxy; M. Fracture mechanics; M. Double cantilever beam specimen; FRACTURE-BEHAVIOR; VOID NUCLEATION; JOINTS; PHASE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2007.11.004
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The crack-growth resistance (R-curve) of bulk single-edge notch bend (SENB) and adhesively bonded double cantilever beam (DCB) specimens was investigated under mode I loading conditions using two types of rubber-modified epoxy adhesive: one was a liquid rubber (CTBN)-modified adhesive and the other was a cross-linked rubber particle (DCS)-modified adhesive. As a result, for both the SENB and DCB specimens, the gradient of the R-curve for the DCS-modified adhesive was steeper than that for the CTBN-modified one, however, the difference in fracture toughness between DCS- and CTBN-modified adhesives is smaller for DCB than for SENB specimens. To elucidate such behavior, crack-growth simulation based on Gurson's model was conducted, where the DCS- and CTBN-modified adhesives were characterized by both the initial void fraction and nucleation. The difference in the behavior of R-curves was also observed in simulations. Moreover, it was found that the difference in fracture surface roughness observed by SEM for both adhesives correspond to the variation in R-curves. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 55
页数:11
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, ANN BOOK ASTM STAND, V03.01
[2]  
BLACKMAN BPK, 2005, ENG FRACT MECH, V72, P897
[3]   The calculation of adhesive fracture energies in mode I: revisiting the tapered double cantilever beam (TDCB) test [J].
Blackman, BRK ;
Hadavinia, H ;
Kinloch, AJ ;
Paraschi, M ;
Williams, JG .
ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2003, 70 (02) :233-248
[4]  
Cotterell B., 1996, FRACTURE MECH CEMENT
[5]   Mode-I fracture behaviour of adhesive joints .1. Relationship between fracture energy and bond thickness [J].
Daghyani, HR ;
Ye, L ;
Mai, YW .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1995, 53 (3-4) :149-162
[6]   Effect of thermal residual stress on the crack path in adhesively bonded joints [J].
Daghyani, HR ;
Ye, L ;
Mai, YW .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 1996, 31 (10) :2523-2529
[7]   Development of a process zone in rubber-modified epoxy polymers [J].
Du, J ;
Thouless, MD ;
Yee, AF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1998, 92 (03) :271-285
[8]   CONTINUUM THEORY OF DUCTILE RUPTURE BY VOID NUCLEATION AND GROWTH .1. YIELD CRITERIA AND FLOW RULES FOR POROUS DUCTILE MEDIA [J].
GURSON, AL .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1977, 99 (01) :2-15
[9]   MICROMECHANICS OF FRACTURE IN STRUCTURAL ADHESIVE BONDS [J].
HUNSTON, DL ;
KINLOCH, AJ ;
WANG, SS .
JOURNAL OF ADHESION, 1989, 28 (2-3) :103-&
[10]  
IKEDA T, 2003, T JPN SOC MECH ENG, V69, P210