Translation and validation study of the Polish version of the Brief Hepatitis C Knowledge Scale

被引:2
作者
Tronina, Olga [1 ]
Gotlib, Joanna [2 ]
Malkowski, Piotr [3 ]
Jaworski, Mariusz [2 ]
Panczyk, Mariusz [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Fac Med 1, Dept Transplantat Med Nephrol & Internal Med, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Educ & Res Hlth Sci, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Med Univ Warsaw, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Surg & Transplantat Nursing & Extracorporeal, Warsaw, Poland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS; VIRUS-INFECTION; RISK-FACTORS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0235764
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Introduction Chronic hepatitis C (HCV), considered by the World Health Organization as one of the greatest epidemiological health hazards, often with asymptomatic clinical course and one which, due to scanty knowledge, remains a crucial risk factor of serious chronic HCV infection complications. The purpose of this study is to validate the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the validated Brief Hepatitis C Knowledge Scale (BHCKS_PL), developed by Balfour in 2009. Methods The study, conducted from May to July 2018, included 246 persons (68,69% females), divided into four subgroups: patients (n = 86), nursing students (n = 74), medical students (n = 28), healthcare workers (nurses and doctors; n = 58). The 19-items questionnaire contained questions designed to assess general knowledge regarding hepatitis C and the transmission risk factors. Results An evaluation by means of multiple comparisons in pairs showed that there were significant differences in the knowledge level between the group of patients and the group of nursing students (Mdn: 14.0 vs 11.0, z = 7.713, P<0.001), and between students of medicine (Mdn: 16.0 vs 11.0, z = 0.339, P<0.001) and healthcare workers (17.0 vs 11.0, z = 11.447, P<0.001). Moreover, significant differences were observed between the groups of students of nursing and medicine (Mdn: 14.0 vs 16.0, z = 3.646, P = 0.002) and healthcare workers (Mdn: 14.0 vs 17.0, z = 4.117, P<0.001). No significant differences in the knowledge level between the students of medicine and healthcare workers were observed (z = 0.377, P = 1.000). Conclusions The completed validation suggests good BHCKS_P psychometric characteristics with the internal consistency convergent and known-groups validity. The questionnaire can be used in educational practice. The obtained results of the measurement provide information about the studied person based on the total score.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [21] A validation study of after direct-acting antivirals recommendation for surveillance score for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C virus infection who had received direct-acting antiviral therapy and achieved sustained virological response
    Tada, Toshifumi
    Kurosaki, Masayuki
    Tamaki, Nobuharu
    Yasui, Yutaka
    Mori, Nami
    Tsuji, Keiji
    Hasebe, Chitomi
    Joko, Koji
    Akahane, Takehiro
    Furuta, Koichiro
    Kobashi, Haruhiko
    Kimura, Hiroyuki
    Yagisawa, Hitoshi
    Marusawa, Hiroyuki
    Kondo, Masahiko
    Kojima, Yuji
    Yoshida, Hideo
    Uchida, Yasushi
    Nakamura, Shinichiro
    Izumi, Namiki
    JGH OPEN, 2022, 6 (01): : 20 - 28