The relevance of critical flux concept in the concentration of skim milk using forward osmosis and reverse osmosis

被引:15
|
作者
Artemi, Anna [1 ]
Chen, George Q. [2 ]
Kentish, Sandra E. [2 ]
Lee, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Chem Engn, ARC Dairy Innovat Hub, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Dairy concentration; Protein fouling; Pressure-assisted forward osmosis; Hydraulic pressure; Osmotic pressure; CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MEMBRANE; RECOVERY; PRESSURE; WHEY; DEPOSITION; TRANSITION; BEHAVIOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118357
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Skim milk was concentrated at 10 degrees C using forward osmosis (FO), reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure-assisted forward osmosis (PAFO). A pressure of 40 bar, in the form of draw solution osmotic pressure (FO and PAFO modes) or transmembrane hydraulic pressure (RO mode) was applied; an additional hydraulic pressure of 2 bar was applied in the PAFO mode. More severe protein fouling was observed in RO, followed by PAFO and then FO. This was credited to the difference in the initial permeate flux, induced by the different effective driving pressures, with RO having a greater deviation of the initial flux from the critical flux value. The critical flux was determined for the FO and RO modes using a step-wise increase of draw solution osmotic pressure or hydraulic pressure, at a constant milk solids content. The critical flux was between 5.4 L/m(2)h (1.5 x 10(-6) m(3)/m(2)s) and 7.2 L/m(2)h (2 x 10(-6) m(3)/m(2)s) for both the FO and RO modes at a cross flow velocity of 0.2 m/s. The similarities in the critical flux for FO and RO suggests that the critical flux does not depend on the nature of pressure applied on the system (hydraulic or osmotic). Therefore, when operated at the same flux and crossflow velocity, FO would not fundamentally provide a lower fouling environment compared to RO. An increase of the solids content from 8.7% to 17.3% caused a reduction in the critical flux from 5.4 L/m(2)h to 3.1 L/m(2)h (8.5 x 10(-7) m(3)/m(2)s).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Exploring the differences between forward osmosis and reverse osmosis fouling
    Siddiqui, Farrukh Arsalan
    She, Qianhong
    Fane, Anthony G.
    Field, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2018, 565 : 241 - 253
  • [32] REVERSE OSMOSIS FOR MILK AND WHEY
    NIELSEN, IK
    OLSEN, OJ
    BUNDGAARD, AG
    MADSEN, RF
    PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY, 1972, 7 (09) : 17 - +
  • [33] Development of a simulation program for the forward osmosis and reverse osmosis process
    Choi, Yong-Jun
    Hwang, Tae-Mun
    Oh, Hyunje
    Nam, Sook-Hyun
    Lee, Sangho
    Jeon, Jei-cheol
    Han, Sang Jong
    Chung, Yonkyu
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2011, 33 (1-3) : 273 - 282
  • [34] Comparison of polysaccharide fouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis separations
    Xie, Zhangwang
    Nagaraja, Nagaveena
    Skillman, Lucy
    Li, Dan
    Ho, Goen
    DESALINATION, 2017, 402 : 174 - 184
  • [35] Role of pressure in organic fouling in forward osmosis and reverse osmosis
    Xie, Ming
    Lee, Jongho
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2015, 493 : 748 - 754
  • [36] On the potential of forward osmosis to energetically outperform reverse osmosis desalination
    McGovern, Ronan K.
    Lienhard, John H.
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2014, 469 : 245 - 250
  • [37] A pilot scale study on the concentration of milk and whey by forward osmosis
    Chen, George Q.
    Artemi, Anna
    Lee, Judy
    Gras, Sally L.
    Kentish, Sandra E.
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 215 : 652 - 659
  • [38] Permeate flux prediction in apple juice concentration by reverse osmosis
    Alvarez, V
    Alvarez, S
    Riera, FA
    Alvarez, R
    JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1997, 127 (01) : 25 - 34
  • [39] Forward osmosis concentration of milk: Product quality and processing considerations
    Beldie, Anamaria Andreea
    Moraru, Carmen I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2021, 104 (07) : 7522 - 7533
  • [40] Optimization of forward osmosis system for the utilization of reverse osmosis brine
    Christian Eusebio, Ramon
    Angelo Promentilla, Michael
    Kim, Han Seung
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2016, 57 (57) : 27899 - 27904