The relevance of critical flux concept in the concentration of skim milk using forward osmosis and reverse osmosis

被引:15
|
作者
Artemi, Anna [1 ]
Chen, George Q. [2 ]
Kentish, Sandra E. [2 ]
Lee, Judy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Surrey, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Guildford GU2 7XH, Surrey, England
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Chem Engn, ARC Dairy Innovat Hub, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
Dairy concentration; Protein fouling; Pressure-assisted forward osmosis; Hydraulic pressure; Osmotic pressure; CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATION; MEMBRANE; RECOVERY; PRESSURE; WHEY; DEPOSITION; TRANSITION; BEHAVIOR; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118357
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Skim milk was concentrated at 10 degrees C using forward osmosis (FO), reverse osmosis (RO) and pressure-assisted forward osmosis (PAFO). A pressure of 40 bar, in the form of draw solution osmotic pressure (FO and PAFO modes) or transmembrane hydraulic pressure (RO mode) was applied; an additional hydraulic pressure of 2 bar was applied in the PAFO mode. More severe protein fouling was observed in RO, followed by PAFO and then FO. This was credited to the difference in the initial permeate flux, induced by the different effective driving pressures, with RO having a greater deviation of the initial flux from the critical flux value. The critical flux was determined for the FO and RO modes using a step-wise increase of draw solution osmotic pressure or hydraulic pressure, at a constant milk solids content. The critical flux was between 5.4 L/m(2)h (1.5 x 10(-6) m(3)/m(2)s) and 7.2 L/m(2)h (2 x 10(-6) m(3)/m(2)s) for both the FO and RO modes at a cross flow velocity of 0.2 m/s. The similarities in the critical flux for FO and RO suggests that the critical flux does not depend on the nature of pressure applied on the system (hydraulic or osmotic). Therefore, when operated at the same flux and crossflow velocity, FO would not fundamentally provide a lower fouling environment compared to RO. An increase of the solids content from 8.7% to 17.3% caused a reduction in the critical flux from 5.4 L/m(2)h to 3.1 L/m(2)h (8.5 x 10(-7) m(3)/m(2)s).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Forward osmosis concentration of skim and whole milk at different temperatures: effect on flux and milk powder quality.
    Beldie, A.
    Moraru, C. I.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2019, 102 : 8 - 9
  • [2] Concentration of skim milk by forward osmosis using delactosed permeate as an innovative draw solution
    Blais, Herehau N.
    Schroen, Karin
    Tobin, John
    INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL, 2023, 137
  • [3] A cascade microfiltration and reverse osmosis approach for energy efficient concentration of skim milk
    Blais, Herehau
    Ho, Quang Tri
    Murphy, Eoin G.
    Schroen, Karin
    Tobin, John T.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2021, 300
  • [4] THE MANUFACTURE OF YOGURT USING REVERSE-OSMOSIS CONCENTRATED SKIM MILK
    GUIRGUIS, N
    VERSTEEG, K
    HICKEY, MW
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 42 (1-2) : 7 - 10
  • [5] EFFECT OF FOULING ON FLUX AND ON ENERGY-REQUIREMENTS IN REVERSE-OSMOSIS OF SKIM MILK
    STABILE, RL
    ROGER, NF
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1985, 68 (08) : 1917 - 1925
  • [6] CONCENTRATION OF MILK BY ULTRAFILTRATION AND REVERSE OSMOSIS
    GLOVER, FA
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 1971, 38 (03) : 373 - &
  • [7] MILK CONCENTRATION BY REVERSE-OSMOSIS
    SCHMIDT, D
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY IN AUSTRALIA, 1987, 39 (01): : 24 - 26
  • [8] A comparison of reverse osmosis, nanofiltration and ultrafiltration as concentration processes for skim milk prior to drying
    Syrios, Andreas
    Faka, Marianthi
    Grandison, Alistair S.
    Lewis, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DAIRY TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) : 467 - 472
  • [9] Modeling water flux in forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis accounting for reverse solute flux
    Tan, J. X.
    Ahmad, A. L.
    Li, M.
    Lau, W. J.
    Ab Rahim, M. H.
    Weihs, G. A. Fimbres
    Liang, Y. Y.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2025, 13 (02):
  • [10] Concentration of ammonium diuranate effluent by reverse osmosis and forward osmosis membrane processes
    Ghosh, A. K.
    Bindal, R. C.
    Prabhakar, S.
    Tewari, P. K.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2014, 52 (1-3) : 432 - 437