Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation

被引:29
作者
Arnold, D. [1 ]
Demyanov, V. [1 ]
Tatum, D. [1 ]
Christie, M. [1 ]
Rojas, T. [1 ]
Geiger, S. [1 ]
Corbett, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Inst Petr Engn, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; History matching; Risk; Geomodelling; Geostatistics; Benchmark; NEIGHBORHOOD ALGORITHM; GEOPHYSICAL INVERSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cageo.2012.09.011
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Benchmark problems have been generated to test a number of issues related to predicting reservoir behaviour (e.g. Floris et al., 2001, Christie and Blunt, 2001, Peters et al., 2010). However, such cases are usually focused on a particular aspect of the reservoir model (e.g. upscaling, property distribution, history matching, uncertainty prediction, etc.) and the other decisions in constructing the model are fixed by log values that are related to the distribution of cell properties away from the wells, fixed grids and structural features and fixed fluid properties. This is because all these features require an element of interpretation, from indirect measurements of the reservoir, noisy and incomplete data and judgments based on domain knowledge. Therefore, there is a need for a case study that would consider interpretational uncertainty integrated throughout the reservoir modelling workflow. In this benchmark study we require the modeller to make interpretational choices as well as to select the techniques applied to the case study, namely the geomodelling approach, history matching algorithm and/or uncertainty quantification technique. The interpretational choices will be around the following areas: (1) Top structure interpretation from seismic and well picks. (2) Fault location, dimensions and the connectivity of the network uncertainty. (3) Facies modelling approach. (4) Facies interpretations from well logs cutoffs. (5) Petrophysical property prediction from the available well data. (6) Grid resolution-choice between number of iterations and model resolution to capture the reservoir features adequately. A semi-synthetic study is based on real field data provided: production data, seismic sections to interpret the faults and top structures, wireline logs to identify fades correlations and saturation profile and porosity and permeability data and a host of other data. To make this problem useable in a manageable time period multiple hierarchically related gridded models were produced for a range of different interpretational choices. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 15
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Arnold D., 2009, THESIS HERIOT WATT U
[2]  
Bond C. E., 2007, GSA Today, V17, P4, DOI [DOI 10.1130/GSAT01711A.1, 10.1130/GSAT01711A.1]
[3]  
Caers J, 2011, MODELING UNCERTAINTY IN THE EARTH SCIENCES, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781119995920
[4]  
Castro S, 2005, 18 STANF U STANF CTR
[5]  
Challenor P., 2011, SIMPLICITY COMPLEXIT, P69
[6]  
Christie M A., 2005, Los Alamos Science, V29, P6
[7]   Tenth SPE comparative solution project: A comparison of upscaling techniques [J].
Christie, MA ;
Blunt, MJ .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2001, 4 (04) :308-317
[8]   Uncertainty quantification for porous media flows [J].
Christie, Mike ;
Demyanov, Vasily ;
Erbas, Demet .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2006, 217 (01) :143-158
[9]  
Demyanov V., 2004, 9 EUR C MATH OIL REC
[10]  
Erbas D., 2006, DOES SAMPLING STRATE