External Cephalic Version-Related Risks A Meta-analysis

被引:116
作者
Grootscholten, Kim
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
Oei, S. Guid
Mol, Ben W. J.
van der Post, Joris A.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1151
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [31] EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AFTER PREVIOUS CESAREAN-SECTION
    FLAMM, BL
    FRIED, MW
    LONKY, NM
    GILES, WS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (02) : 370 - 372
  • [32] Flock F, 1998, Zentralbl Gynakol, V120, P60
  • [33] Giusti M, 2000, Minerva Ginecol, V52, P221
  • [34] EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AT TERM
    GOH, JTW
    JOHNSON, CM
    GREGORA, MG
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 33 (04) : 364 - 366
  • [35] Guyer C H, 2001, J Obstet Gynaecol, V21, P580
  • [36] THE EFFICACY OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AND ITS IMPACT ON THE BREECH EXPERIENCE
    HANSS, JW
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1990, 162 (06) : 1459 - 1464
  • [37] Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit
    Healey, M
    Porter, R
    Galimberti, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 (09): : 1073 - 1079
  • [38] THE FREQUENCY OF BREECH PRESENTATION BY GESTATIONAL-AGE AT BIRTH - A LARGE POPULATION-BASED STUDY
    HICKOK, DE
    GORDON, DC
    MILBERG, JA
    WILLIAMS, MA
    DALING, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (03) : 851 - 852
  • [39] Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis
    Higgins, JPT
    Thompson, SG
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2002, 21 (11) : 1539 - 1558
  • [40] Higgins M, 2006, J Obstet Gynaecol, V26, P744