External Cephalic Version-Related Risks A Meta-analysis

被引:116
作者
Grootscholten, Kim
Kok, Marjolein [1 ]
Oei, S. Guid
Mol, Ben W. J.
van der Post, Joris A.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818b4ade
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature on external cephalic version-related complications and to assess if the outcome of a version attempt is related to complications. DATA SOURCES: In March 2007 we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies reporting on complications from an external cephalic version attempt for singleton breech pregnancies after 36 weeks of pregnancy were selected. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) from studies that reported both on complications as well as on the position of the fetus immediately after the procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We found 84 studies, reporting on 12,955 version attempts that reported on external cephalic version-related complications. The pooled complication rate was 6.1% (95% CI 4.7-7.8), 0.24% for serious complications (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.34) and 0.35% for emergency cesarean deliveries (95% CI 0.26-0.47). Complications were not related to external cephalic version outcome (OR 1.2 (95% CI 0.93-1.7). CONCLUSION: External cephalic version is a safe procedure. Complications are not related to the fetal position after external cephalic version.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1151
页数:9
相关论文
共 98 条
  • [1] ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice, 2006, Obstet Gynecol, V108, P235
  • [2] External cephalic version: Predictors of success
    Aisenbrey, GA
    Catanzarite, VA
    Nelson, C
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (05) : 783 - 786
  • [3] External cephalic version at term with tocolysis and vibroacoustic stimulation
    Annapoorna, V
    Arulkumaran, S
    Anandakumar, C
    Chua, S
    Montan, S
    Ratnam, SS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1997, 59 (01) : 13 - 18
  • [4] Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version
    Ben-Haroush, A
    Perri, T
    Bar, J
    Yogev, Y
    Bar-Hava, I
    Hod, M
    Kaplan, B
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2002, 19 (07) : 355 - 360
  • [5] The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: A 3-year cumulative experience
    BenArie, A
    Kogan, S
    Schachter, M
    Hagay, ZJ
    Insler, V
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1995, 63 (02): : 125 - 129
  • [6] THE INTRODUCTION OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION AT TERM INTO ROUTINE CLINICAL-PRACTICE
    BEWLEY, S
    ROBSON, SC
    SMITH, M
    GLOVER, A
    SPENCER, JAD
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 1993, 52 (02): : 89 - 93
  • [7] The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: A 14-year experience
    Boucher, M
    Bujold, E
    Marquette, GP
    Vezina, Y
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (03) : 751 - 754
  • [8] A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION WITH TOCOLYSIS IN LATE PREGNANCY
    BROCKS, V
    PHILIPSEN, T
    SECHER, NJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1984, 91 (07): : 653 - 656
  • [9] Sublingual nitroglycerin versus placebo as a tocolytic for external cephalic version: A randomized controlled trial in parous women
    Bujold, E
    Boucher, M
    Rinfret, D
    Berman, S
    Ferreira, E
    Marquette, GP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (04) : 1070 - 1073
  • [10] Sublingual nitroglycerin versus intravenous ritodrine as tocolytic for external cephalic version: A double-blinded randomized trial
    Bujold, E
    Marquette, GP
    Ferreira, E
    Gauthier, R
    Boucher, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) : 1454 - 1457