Biological and Technical Complications of Splinted or Nonsplinted Dental Implants: A Decision Tree for Selection

被引:32
作者
Ravida, Andrea [1 ]
Saleh, Muhammad H. A. [1 ]
Carreno Muriel, Miguel [2 ]
Maska, Bartosz [1 ]
Wang, Hom-Lay [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, 1011 North Univ Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Complutense, Dent Sci, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Dent, Dept Periodont & Oral Med, Grad Periodont, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
dental implant; splinted implants; implant success; PARTIALLY EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; IMMEDIATELY PLACED IMPLANTS; TERM BONE STABILITY; LEAST; 5; YEARS; ADJACENT IMPLANTS; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; FOLLOW-UP; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; SUPPORTED RESTORATIONS; CLINICAL-EVALUATION;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000721
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To present an in-depth review on splinting versus nonsplinting the restorations of adjacent dental implants, in addition to discussing biological and technical complications associated with either choice; and to provide the clinician with a decision tree that serves in everyday judgments when it comes to addressing this issue. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive literature review was performed for articles comparing success of splinted versus nonsplinted dental implants. Results: There is no evidence to suggest that implementing either prosthetic design results in higher implant survival. Both designs tend to have their own set of complications, but there is compelling evidence to suggest that splinted restorations generally have less technical complications. Conclusion: Either splinting or nonsplinting are valid options for restoring adjacent implants, but each tend to face different biological and technical complications. Knowing which patients are more likely to face particular complications is strategic to provide patients with successful restorations.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [11] A Prospective Multicenter 5-Year Radiographic Evaluation of Crestal Bone Levels Over Time in 596 Dental Implants Placed in 192 Patients
    Cochran, David L.
    Nummikoski, Pirkka V.
    Schoolfield, John D.
    Jones, Archie A.
    Oates, Thomas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (05) : 725 - 733
  • [12] Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population: Prevalence of Peri-implantitis
    Derks, J.
    Schaller, D.
    Hakansson, J.
    Wennstrom, J. L.
    Tomasi, C.
    Berglundh, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [13] The effect of loading on peri-implant bone: a critical review of the literature
    Duyck, J.
    Vandamme, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2014, 41 (10) : 783 - 794
  • [14] Effect of 3-and 4-mm Interimplant Distances on the Height of Interimplant Bone Crest: A Histomorphometric Evaluation Measured on Bone Level Dental Implants in Minipig
    Elian, Nicolas
    Bloom, Mitchell
    Trushkowsky, Richard D.
    Dard, Michel M.
    Tarnow, Dennis
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (05) : 522 - 528
  • [15] ERICSSON I, 1995, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V22, P255
  • [16] Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects
    Ferreira, S. D.
    Silva, G. L. M.
    Cortelli, J. R.
    Costa, J. E.
    Costa, F. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 33 (12) : 929 - 935
  • [17] Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses
    Goodacre, CJ
    Bernal, G
    Rungcharassaeng, K
    Kan, JYK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2003, 90 (02) : 121 - 132
  • [18] Effect of splinting and interproximal contact tightness on load transfer by implant restorations
    Guichet, DL
    Yoshinobu, D
    Caputo, AA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2002, 87 (05) : 528 - 535
  • [19] Gunne J, 1994, Int J Prosthodont, V7, P143
  • [20] HAANAES HR, 1990, J CLIN PERIODONTOL, V17, P516