Intelligence, religiosity and homosexuality non-acceptance: Empirical evidence

被引:18
作者
Souza, Tatiene C. [1 ]
Cribari-Neto, Francisco [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Paraiba, Dept Estat, BR-58051900 Joao Pessoa, Paraiba, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Pernambuco, Dept Estat, BR-50740540 Recife, PE, Brazil
关键词
Beta regression model; Homosexuality; Intelligence; Religion; BETA-REGRESSION; INFLUENCE DIAGNOSTICS; UNITED-STATES; ATTITUDES; SEX; RATES; GAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.intell.2015.07.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Our main goal is to explain the proportion of homosexuality non-acceptance, i.e., the proportion of people for whom homosexuality can never be justified. To that end, we use data on 52 countries and consider the beta regression model which is tailored for rates and proportions. We use several conditioning variables, such as average intelligence, per capita income, an indicator as to whether the country is Muslim, an income inequality index and a religious diversity index. It is noteworthy that homosexuality non-acceptance negatively correlates with average intelligence (-0.58) and with religious disbelief (-0.52). The estimated regression coefficients corresponding to such covariates are -0.0207 and -12.3636, respectively. They are both negative and statistically significant. The implication is that homosexuality non-acceptance tends to decrease when average intelligence or religious disbelief increases. We construct impact curves that measure such impacts and show how their strengths change with the relevant conditioning variables. The estimated impacts are almost always stronger for Muslim nations; they can be nearly twice as strong for such countries. The estimated impacts are also stronger when average intelligence and the prevalence of religious disbelievers are small. Bootstrap confidence intervals are also computed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 70
页数:8
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Economic inequality and intolerance: Attitudes toward homosexuality in 35 democracies [J].
Andersen, Robert ;
Fetner, Tina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2008, 52 (04) :942-958
[2]   Cohort differences in tolerance of homosexuality - Attitudinal change in Canada and the United States, 1981-2000 [J].
Andersen, Robert ;
Fetner, Tina .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2008, 72 (02) :311-330
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Generalized linear model
[4]   The shifting foundations of public opinion about gay rights [J].
Brewer, PR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2003, 65 (04) :1208-1220
[5]   DETECTION OF INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATION IN LINEAR-REGRESSION [J].
COOK, RD .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1977, 19 (01) :15-18
[6]   Religious belief and intelligence: Worldwide evidence [J].
Cribari-Neto, Francisco ;
Souza, Tatiene C. .
INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 41 (05) :482-489
[7]   Testing inference in variable dispersion beta regressions [J].
Cribari-Neto, Francisco ;
Souza, Tatiene C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2012, 82 (12) :1827-1843
[8]  
Cribari-Neto F, 2010, J STAT SOFTW, V34, P1
[9]   PUBLIC ENDORSEMENT OF RESTRICTIONS ON 3 ASPECTS OF FREE EXPRESSION BY HOMOSEXUALS - SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC AND TRENDS ANALYSIS 1973-1988 [J].
DEJOWSKI, EF .
JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 1992, 23 (04) :1-18
[10]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26