Application of CO2-foam as a means of reducing carbon dioxide mobility

被引:29
作者
Khalil, F [1 ]
Asghari, K
机构
[1] Bantrel Inc, Calgary, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY | 2006年 / 45卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2118/06-05-02
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Reducing the mobility of carbon dioxide through co-injection; of CO2 and a suitable surfactant solution to form a CO2-foam system is a promising method for improving the oil recovery in carbon dioxide flooding projects. This paper presents the results of a set of experiments on screening and selecting a suitable surfactant for CO2-foam purposes in a carbonate porous medium, as well as the effect of various parameters on the mobility of the 1 CO2-foam system. Four surfactants were examined and the one that performed best throughout the screening experiments was used in the subsequent flow experiments. The surfactants tested were Surfonic N-95, Surfonic L24-9, Bio-Terge AS-40, and Chaser CD-1045. The screening criterion selected was the fall in foam height with time at 60 degrees C for 0.1 wt% solution of the above mentioned surfactants. Chaser CD-1045 performed best in all screening tests and was, used during the flow experiments. Flow experiments were conducted through a porous medium made of crushed carbonate at pressures of 8,270 kPa and 10,336, kPa, and temperatures of 22 degrees C and 50 degrees C. Mobility of CO2-brine (simulating the WAG process) and CO2-surfactant systems were compared through a series of experiments. The effect of operating pressure and temperature, brine concentration, and the ratio 1 of the amount of CO2 to total foam (i.e., foam quality) on the mobility of a CO2-foam system were investigated and results are presented. The results indicate that additional oil is recoverable for CO2-foam vs. the co-injection of CO2 and brine simulating the WAG process.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 42
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, P 2000 SPE INT S FOR
[2]  
Bernard G.G., 1980, SOC PET ENG J AUG, P281
[3]  
CASTEEL JF, 1988, SPERE NOV, P1186
[4]  
Chang S.-H., 1994, SPE DOE IMPR OIL REC
[5]   Effects of foam quality and flow rate on CO2-foam behavior at reservoir temperature and pressure [J].
Chang, SH ;
Grigg, RB .
SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 1999, 2 (03) :248-254
[6]  
Chou S., 1992, PAPER SPE
[7]   CO2 FOAM - RESULTS FROM 4 DEVELOPMENTAL FIELD TRIALS [J].
HOEFNER, ML ;
EVANS, EM .
SPE RESERVOIR ENGINEERING, 1995, 10 (04) :273-281
[8]  
HOLM LW, 1998, SPE RESERVOIR EN FEB, P112
[9]   THE EFFECT OF MICROSCOPIC HETEROGENEITY ON CO2-FOAM MOBILITY .1. MECHANISTIC STUDY [J].
HUH, DG ;
COCHRANE, TD ;
KOVARIK, FS .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1989, 41 (08) :872-879
[10]  
KUHLMAN MI, 1994, SPE DOE IMPR OIL REC