Analysis and prioritization of Lean Six Sigma enablers with environmental facets using best worst method: A case of Indian MSMEs

被引:101
作者
Singh, Mahipal [1 ]
Rathi, Rajeev [1 ]
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo [2 ]
机构
[1] Lovely Profess Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India
[2] Univ Derby, Ctr Supply Chain Improvement, Kedleston Rd Campus, Derby DE22 1GB, England
关键词
Environmental Lean Six Sigma; Enablers; Best worst method; MSMEs; Green manufacturing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123592
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Micro-Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) play a prominent role in economic growth because of their significant contribution in terms of manufacturing, sales, and development in any country. Improvements in product quality, waste reduction, environmental measures, green product development, and cost optimization have enforced MSMEs to adopt sustainable development approaches. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is one of the robust methods that reduce waste, variation, emission, and energy in any system. It is indispensable to relook the enablers of environmental LSS to assess sustainability through the successful implementation of this eco-friendly approach. In this context, the present study aims to investigate and prioritize the enablers which facilitate the effective implementation of environmental LSS in MSMEs. Extensive literature and expert's opinions are used to investigate the environmental LSS enablers and grouped them as per their appropriate traits using Exploratory Factor Analysis. The final screening of grouped enablers is done through Importance-index analysis and corrected item minus total correlation method. For prioritization of finalized enablers, a robust decision-making technique, Best Worst Method, is employed with a practical case of Indian MSMEs. The research outcomes reveal that strategic-based enablers are leading in nature, followed by environmental-based enablers. Moreover, current results are validated through the Analytical Hierarchy Process and Analytical Network Process. The present research outcomes are also in good agreement with case organization officials. This study expedites the managers of case organization with prominent enablers, which will help in planning and successful execution of environmental LSS. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development [J].
Aboutorab, Hamed ;
Saberi, Morteza ;
Asadabadi, Mehdi Rajabi ;
Hussain, Omar ;
Chang, Elizabeth .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 107 :115-125
[2]   Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method [J].
Ahmad, Wan Nurul Karimah Wan ;
Rezaei, Jafar ;
Sadaghiani, Saman ;
Tavasszy, Lorant A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 153 (01) :242-252
[3]   Lean Six Sigma for small- and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises: a systematic review [J].
Alexander, Paul ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Rodgers, Bryan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITY & RELIABILITY MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (03) :378-397
[4]   A comparative exploration of lean manufacturing and six sigma in terms of their critical success factors [J].
Alhuraish, Ibrahim ;
Robledo, Christian ;
Kobi, Abdessamad .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 164 :325-337
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Decision Science Letters
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 2050 long-term strategy
[7]  
Antony J, 2017, INT J QUAL RELIAB MA, V34, P1073, DOI 10.1108/IJQRM-03-2016-0035
[8]   Lean Six Sigma and Innovation - an exploratory study among UK organisations [J].
Antony, Jiju ;
Setijono, Djoko ;
Dahlgaard, Jens J. .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2016, 27 (1-2) :124-140
[9]   Observation: A Lean tool for improving the effectiveness of Lean Six Sigma [J].
Arumugam, V. ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Douglas, Alex .
TQM Journal, 2012, 24 (03) :275-287
[10]  
BAILEY A, 2012, INT J TECHNOL MANAGE, V57, P18