Modelling of maintenance, within discrete event simulation

被引:19
作者
Warrington, L [1 ]
Jones, JA [1 ]
Davis, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
来源
ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM, 2002 PROCEEDINGS | 2002年
关键词
simulation; maintenance model; diagnostics; Maintenance Free Operating Period; prognostics;
D O I
10.1109/RAMS.2002.981652
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The concept of Maintenance Free Operating Periods (MFOP) requires co-ordination of failure avoidance, failure anticipation and maintenance delay techniques, with the objective of enhancing operational capability in a cost-effective manner. Individual aspects might be modelled mathematically but discrete event simulation is required for an analysis with the necessary fidelity. The Ultra Reliable Aircraft Model (URAM) is an aircraft reliability and maintenance discrete event simulation designed to investigate MFOP concepts. Analysis during its development identified several important factors pertaining to maintenance: Allocation and scheduling of resource Maintenance objectives and their operational & time-based over-ride Forward planning of scheduled & prognostics based maintenance Diagnostics, covering both fault visibility & isolation Task prioritisation, based on system structural importance, criticality importance, time & cost These have been successfully implemented, making URAM an efficient and representative simulation of aircraft reliability, maintenance support and operational tasking. The factors and their implementation in URAM may easily be transferred to discrete event simulation of other complex assets such as ships and railway systems,
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 265
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Discrete quantity approach to continuous simulation modelling
    Barton, PM
    Tobias, AM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2000, 51 (04) : 485 - 489
  • [32] Combining physical simulation and discrete-event material flow simulation
    Glatt, Moritz
    Kasakow, Georg
    Aurich, Jan C.
    [J]. 51ST CIRP CONFERENCE ON MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2018, 72 : 420 - 425
  • [33] Discrete event simulation of reactive knowledge based systems
    Hamri, Maamar El-Amine
    Torres, Lucile
    Frydman, Claudia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 2006, 10 (06) : 417 - 431
  • [34] Discrete event simulation of human errors in cancer treatment
    Archer, R
    Archer, S
    Keller, L
    Lewis, P
    [J]. SIMULATION IN THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1997, : 8 - 13
  • [35] A discrete event simulation for improving operating theatre efficiency
    Hassanzadeh, Hamed
    Boyle, Justin
    Khanna, Sankalp
    Biki, Barbara
    Syed, Faraz
    Sweeney, Lianne
    Borkwood, Ellen
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 38 (02) : 360 - 376
  • [36] General concepts of quality for discrete-event simulation
    Robinson, S
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 138 (01) : 103 - 117
  • [37] Scheduling and control, performance measures and discrete event simulation
    Roy, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1998, 49 (02) : 151 - 156
  • [38] DISCRETE-EVENT SIMULATION MODELS FOR DIDACTIC SUPPORT
    Rangel, Antia de Lima
    de Assis Rangel, Joao Jose
    Shimoda, Eduardo
    do Nascimento, Janaina Ribeiro
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2016, 13 (03): : 300 - 318
  • [39] Discrete event simulation for the reconfiguration of a flexible manufactuing plant
    Piccinini, A.
    Previdi, F.
    Cimini, C.
    Pinto, R.
    Pirola, F.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2018, 51 (11): : 465 - 470
  • [40] Discrete Event Simulation to Improve Log Yard Operations
    Beaudoin, Daniel
    LeBel, Luc
    Soussi, Mohamed Amine
    [J]. INFOR, 2012, 50 (04) : 175 - 185