Outcome Measures for Interventions to Reduce Inappropriate Chronic Drugs: A Narrative Review

被引:20
作者
Aubert, Carole E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kerr, Eve A. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Maratt, Jennifer K. [6 ]
Klamerus, Mandi L. [3 ,7 ]
Hofer, Timothy P. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Bern Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Internal Med, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Bern, Inst Primary Hlth Care, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Vet Affairs Ctr Clin Management Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[7] Richard L Roudebush Vet Affairs Med Ctr, 1481 W 10th St, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
关键词
deprescribing; inappropriate medication; withdrawal; interventions; measures; OLDER-ADULTS; MULTIMORBIDITY; POLYPHARMACY; ATTITUDES; EDUCATION; PEOPLE; IMPACT; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.16697
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Inappropriate prescribing is a highly important problem, given the growing aging multimorbid population with associated polypharmacy. An increasing number of studies have recently developed and tested interventions to withdraw inappropriate drugs, a process called deprescribing. However, we still lack complete information on the types and prevalence of measures used to assess the success of such interventions. OBJECTIVE To categorize and synthesize the full spectrum of measures used in intervention studies focused on reducing inappropriate prescribing of chronic drugs in adults, to standardize measurements in future studies and help researchers design studies inclusive of the important measure types. DESIGN We searched Ovid/MEDLINE to identify intervention studies focused on deprescribing chronic drugs in adults, published between 2010 and 2019. MEASUREMENTS We extracted data on study characteristics, intervention components, and outcome measures. We categorized and synthesized the measures using a comprehensive and systematic framework, separating measures of intended and unintended consequences. RESULTS Most (90/93) studies used measures of appropriate prescribing, such as drug cessation or dose reduction. The following measures were used infrequently across studies: patient-reported experience, preferences, and outcome (12 (13%), 2 (2%), and 25 (27%) studies, respectively); provider-reported experience (11 (12%) studies); patient-provider interaction (4 (4%) studies); and measures of unintended consequences (24 (26%) studies). Studies varied in the type and number of measures assessed, ranging from 1 to 20 different measures by study. CONCLUSION To ensure initiation, success, and long-term sustainability of deprescribing, it is important to assess the success of intervention studies using clinically relevant patient- and provider-centered measures. This categorized synthesis of outcome measures used in deprescribing studies may facilitate implementation of important measure types (e.g., patient-reported measures and measures of unintended consequences) in future studies.
引用
收藏
页码:2390 / 2398
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Deprescribing anticholinergic and sedative medicines: protocol for a Feasibility Trial (DEFEAT-polypharmacy) in residential aged care facilities
    Ailabouni, Nagham
    Mangin, Dee
    Nishtala, Prasad S.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (04):
  • [2] American Board of Internal Medicine, CHOOS WIS IN ABIM FD
  • [3] Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults: Deprescribing with a Clinical Pharmacist
    Ammerman, Catherine A.
    Simpkins, Brent A.
    Warman, Nora
    Downs, Tara N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 (01) : 115 - 118
  • [4] Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
    Anderson, Kristen
    Stowasser, Danielle
    Freeman, Christopher
    Scott, Ian
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2014, 4 (12):
  • [5] Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study
    Barnett, Karen
    Mercer, Stewart W.
    Norbury, Michael
    Watt, Graham
    Wyke, Sally
    Guthrie, Bruce
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 380 (9836) : 37 - 43
  • [6] International core outcome set for clinical trials of medication review in multi-morbid older patients with polypharmacy
    Beuscart, Jean-Baptiste
    Knol, Wilma
    Cullinan, Shane
    Schneider, Claudio
    Dalleur, Olivia
    Boland, Benoit
    Thevelin, Stefanie
    Jansen, Paul A. F.
    O'Mahony, Denis
    Rodondi, Nicolas
    Spinewine, Anne
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2018, 16
  • [7] Measuring the effect of Choosing Wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value care
    Bhatia, R. Sacha
    Levinson, Wendy
    Shortt, Samuel
    Pendrith, Ciara
    Fric-Shamji, Elana
    Kallewaard, Marjon
    Peul, Wilco
    Veillard, Jeremy
    Elshaug, Adam
    Forde, Ian
    Kerr, Eve A.
    [J]. BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (08) : 523 - 531
  • [8] Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older people in the United Kingdom
    Bradley, Marie C.
    Motterlini, Nicola
    Padmanabhan, Shivani
    Cahir, Caitriona
    Williams, Tim
    Fahey, Tom
    Hughes, Carmel M.
    [J]. BMC GERIATRICS, 2014, 14
  • [9] Antipsychotic Deprescription for Older Adults in Long-term Care: The HALT Study
    Brodaty, Henry
    Aerts, Liesbeth
    Harrison, Fleur
    Jessop, Tiffany
    Cations, Monica
    Chenoweth, Lynn
    Shell, Allan
    Popovic, Gordana C.
    Heffernan, Megan
    Hilmer, Sarah
    Sachdev, Perminder S.
    Draper, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2018, 19 (07) : 592 - +
  • [10] Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world
    Brownlee, Shannon
    Chalkidou, Kalipso
    Doust, Jenny
    Elshaug, Adam G.
    Glasziou, Paul
    Heath, Iona
    Nagpal, Somil
    Saini, Vikas
    Srivastava, Divya
    Chalmers, Kelsey
    Korenstein, Deborah
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 390 (10090) : 156 - 168