Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience

被引:114
作者
Marras, WS [1 ]
Parakkat, J [1 ]
Chany, AM [1 ]
Yang, G [1 ]
Burr, D [1 ]
Lavender, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Biodynam Lab, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
low back pain; spine loads; electromyography; modeling; ergonomics;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.10.004
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background. Physiological and psychophysical studies of the effects of lifting frequency have focused on whole-body measurements of fatigue or subjective acceptance of the task and have not considered how spine loads may change as a function of lift frequency or lift time exposure. Our understanding of biomechanical spine loading has been extrapolated from short lifting bouts to the entire work day and may have led us to incorrect assumptions. The objective of this project was to document how spine loading changes as a function of experience, lift frequency, and lift duration while repetitively lifting over the course of an 8-h workday. Methods. Twelve novice and twelve experienced manual materials handlers performed repetitive, asymmetric lifts at different load and lift frequency levels throughout an 8-h exposure period. Compression, anterior-posterior shear, and lateral shear were evaluated over the lifting period using an EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Results Spinal loads increased after the first 2 h of lifting exposure regardless of the lift frequency. Loading was also greater for the inexperienced subjects compared to experienced lifters. The greatest spine loads occurred at those lift frequencies and weights to which the workers were unaccustomed. Interpretation. Increases in spine loading were tracked back to the changes in muscle recruitment patterns that typically involved increased muscle coactivation. The results emphasize the importance of previous motor programming in defining spine loads during repetitive lifting. These results indicate a very different influence of frequency and lift time exposure compared to physiologic and psychophysical assessments. This study has shown that it is not sufficient to extrapolate from short lift periods to extended exposure periods if the biomechanical loading implications of the task are of interest. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 352
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
ANDEROSN VP, 1988, CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DI
[2]   REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND COMPARISON OF MODELS FOR PREDICTING LIFTING CAPACITY [J].
AYOUB, MM ;
MITAL, A ;
ASFOUR, SS ;
BETHEA, NJ .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1980, 22 (03) :257-269
[3]   Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task [J].
Bonato, P ;
Ebenbichler, GR ;
Roy, SH ;
Lehr, S ;
Posch, M ;
Kollmitzer, J ;
Della Croce, U .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (16) :1810-1820
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF TASK DURATION ON PSYCHOPHYSICALLY-DETERMINED MAXIMUM ACCEPTABLE WEIGHTS AND FORCES [J].
CIRIELLO, VM ;
SNOOK, SH ;
BLICK, AC ;
WILKINSON, PL .
ERGONOMICS, 1990, 33 (02) :187-200
[5]   Evaluation of spinal loading during lowering and lifting [J].
Davis, KG ;
Marras, WS ;
Waters, TR .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (03) :141-152
[6]   Weight and frequency effect on spinal loading in a bricklaying task [J].
deLooze, MP ;
Visser, B ;
Houting, I ;
vanRooy, MAG ;
vanDieen, JH ;
Toussaint, HM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 29 (11) :1425-1433
[7]   Repetitive lifting tasks fatigue the back muscles and increase the bending moment acting on the lumbar spine [J].
Dolan, P ;
Adams, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 31 (08) :713-721
[8]   UNCERTAINTY SETS ASSOCIATED WITH SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS - BASIS OF SATISFACTION CONTROL [J].
ERLANDSON, RF ;
FLEMING, DG .
VISION RESEARCH, 1974, 14 (07) :481-486
[9]   Method for measuring external spinal loads during unconstrained free-dynamic lifting [J].
Fathallah, FA ;
Marras, WS ;
Parnianpour, M ;
Granata, KP .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 30 (09) :975-978
[10]   EFFECTS OF LIFTING FREQUENCY AND TECHNIQUE ON PHYSICAL FATIGUE WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO PSYCHOPHYSICAL METHODOLOGY AND METABOLIC-RATE [J].
GARG, A ;
SAXENA, U .
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1979, 40 (10) :894-903