Exploring the role Delaware plays as a domestic tax haven

被引:131
作者
Dyreng, Scott D. [1 ]
Lindsey, Bradley P. [2 ]
Thornock, Jacob R. [3 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Delaware; Tax haven; Corporate governance; Corporate tax avoidance; CORPORATE; COMPETITION; INCOME; FIRM; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.01.004
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine whether Delaware is a domestic tax haven. We find that taxes play an economically important role in determining whether U.S. firms locate subsidiaries in Delaware and that a Delaware-based state tax avoidance strategy lowers state effective tax rates by between 0.7 and 1.1 percentage points, on average. The tax savings represent a 15-24% decrease in the state income tax burden and translate to an increase in net income of 1.04-1.47%. However, we find that the tax benefits of Delaware tax strategies are diminishing over time in response to initiatives by state governments to limit multistate tax avoidance. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 772
页数:22
相关论文
共 42 条
[21]  
Fleischer V, 2010, TEX LAW REV, V89, P227
[22]  
Florida Department of Revenue, 1996, 9661001 FLOR DEP REV
[23]  
Fox William F., 2011, STATE TAX NOTES, V59, P167
[24]  
Gallemore J., 2012, REPUTATIONAL C UNPUB
[25]   Tax Havens: International Tax Avoidance and Evasion [J].
Gravelle, Jane G. .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2009, 62 (04) :727-753
[26]   Formula apportionment vs. separate accounting: A private information perspective [J].
Gresik, Thomas A. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 54 (01) :133-149
[27]  
Griffith R., 2011, CORPORATE TAXE UNPUB
[28]   Corporate multistate tax planning: benefits of multiple jurisdictions [J].
Gupta, S ;
Mills, LF .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2002, 33 (01) :117-139
[29]  
Hanlon M., 2011, J FINANCE
[30]   Income misattribution under formula apportionment [J].
Hines, James R., Jr. .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 54 (01) :108-120