Legitimate governance of risk at the EU level?: The case of genetically modified organisms

被引:19
|
作者
Borrás, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Roskilde Univ, Dept Social Sci, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
European governance; risk; genetically modified organisms; democracy; participation; input legitimacy; output legitimacy;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2005.06.011
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the past few years, the EU has been establishing a new regulatory framework for GMOs, a central issue in the governance of risk that came under fierce attack in the mid-1990s. The primary question addressed in this article is whether this new framework will be able to solve the legitimacy problem of GMO governance at the EU level. Focusing on theories concerning input-output legitimacy and democracy and the role of expertise, this article examines the level of involvement of stakeholders in the process leading to the new rules; the predominant mechanisms of representation that have been used in that process; and the forms of participation in the day-to-day governance of risk as envisaged in the new rules. Based on document analysis and a series of interviews with central stakeholders, the conclusions bring up two further theoretical matters regarding EU governance, namely the transformative nature of citizenship and the conceptual distinction between input- and output-legitimacy. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 75
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The judiciary's protection to the risks of Genetically Modified Organisms
    de Morais, Fausto Santos
    de Ivanoff, Felipe
    REVISTA DIREITO AMBIENTAL E SOCIEDADE, 2019, 9 (03): : 81 - 109
  • [42] The influence of intelligence and emotions on the acceptability of genetically modified organisms
    Sorgo, Andrej
    Jausovec, Norbert
    Jausovec, Ksenija
    Puhek, Miro
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 15 (01):
  • [43] When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms
    Andy Thorpe
    Catherine Robinson
    Agriculture and Human Values, 2004, 21 : 287 - 298
  • [44] When goliaths clash: US and EU differences over the labeling of food products derived from genetically modified organisms
    Thorpe, A
    Robinson, C
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2004, 21 (04) : 287 - 298
  • [45] Environmental risks of chemicals and genetically modified organisms:: A comparison -: Part II:: Sustainability and precaution in risk assessment and risk management
    Steinhäuser, KG
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2001, 8 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [46] Porousness and Peru's moratorium on genetically modified organisms: stakeholder epistemologies and neoliberal science
    Dondanville, T. W.
    Dougherty, Michael L.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY, 2020, 6 (01): : 107 - 119
  • [47] Are the precautionary principle and the international trade of genetically modified organisms reconcilable?
    Matthee, M
    Vermersch, D
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL & ENVIRONMENTAL ETHICS, 2000, 12 (01) : 59 - 70
  • [48] ATTITUDES TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED ORGANISMS AND FOOD AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
    Utkualp, N.
    Ozdemir, A.
    Bicer, M.
    Ozdemir, B.
    OXIDATION COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 39 (01): : 384 - 395
  • [49] Detection of genetically modified organisms in soy feed and food in Romania
    Barbuceanu, Florica
    Zybaczynski, Iulia
    Dumitrescu, Diana Ionela
    Predoi, Gabriel
    Baraitareanu, Stelian
    ROMANIAN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL LETTERS, 2021, 26 (01): : 2223 - 2229
  • [50] A piezoelectric affinity biosensor for genetically modified organisms (GMOs) detection
    Minunni, M
    Tombelli, S
    Pratesi, S
    Mascini, M
    Piatti, P
    Bogani, P
    Buiatti, M
    Mascini, M
    ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 2001, 34 (06) : 825 - 840