Systematic review and meta-analysis: Dose-response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders

被引:61
|
作者
Jakubovski, Ewgeni [1 ]
Johnson, Jessica A. [2 ]
Nasir, Madeeha [2 ]
Mueller-Vahl, Kirsten [1 ]
Bloch, Michael H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Psychiat Social Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Hannover, Germany
[2] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, Yale Child Study Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
anxiety disorders; meta-analysis; panic disorder; serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; serotonin reuptake inhibitors; social anxiety disorder; tolerability; VENLAFAXINE EXTENDED-RELEASE; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENERALIZED SOCIAL PHOBIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; PANIC DISORDER; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENTS; NONDEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS;
D O I
10.1002/da.22854
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe aimed to examine the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for anxiety disorders examining overall symptom improvement, likelihood of treatment response, time course of treatment response, individual pharmacological agent, diagnostic indication dose, and tolerability. MethodsWe searched PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of SSRIs/SNRIs in adult patients with anxiety disorders that provided data at three or more time points. Extracted data included trial duration, weekly/biweekly anxiety scores for 12weeks. ResultsMeta-analysis included 57 trials (N=16,056). A linear mixed model analysis based on weekly outcome data suggested that for SNRI a logarithmic model offered the best fit compared to placebo (indicating the greatest incremental improvement from baseline occurred early in treatment); whereas for SSRI a linear model provided the best fit (indicating a similar improvement over the duration of the acute treatment phase). There were no significant differences in efficacy between pharmacological agents within each class or when comparing SSRIs to SNRIs. The greatest treatment benefits were observed for social anxiety disorder for both medication classes. Higher doses of SSRIs, but not SNRIs, were associated with significantly greater symptom improvement and likelihood of treatment response. For both medical classes, higher doses were associated with an increased likelihood of dropout due to side effects. ConclusionsSSRIs and SNRIs are effective in treating anxiety disorders. Higher doses of SSRIs within the therapeutic range are associated with greater treatment benefit, whereas higher doses of SNRIs are not.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 212
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anxiety disorders and all-cause mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Miloyan, Beyon
    Bulley, Adam
    Bandeen-Roche, Karen
    Eaton, William W.
    Goncalves-Bradley, Daniela C.
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 51 (11) : 1467 - 1475
  • [42] EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF ANTIDEPRESSANTS IN PEDIATRIC ANXIETY DISORDERS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    Welge, Jeffrey A.
    Wehry, Anna M.
    Keeshin, Brooks
    Rynn, Moira A.
    DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2015, 32 (03) : 149 - 157
  • [43] Chocolate and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Jakub Morze
    Carolina Schwedhelm
    Aleksander Bencic
    Georg Hoffmann
    Heiner Boeing
    Katarzyna Przybylowicz
    Lukas Schwingshackl
    European Journal of Nutrition, 2020, 59 : 389 - 397
  • [44] Breastfeeding and the risk of childhood cancer: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Qing Su
    Xiaohui Sun
    Liwen Zhu
    Qin Yan
    Peiwen Zheng
    Yingying Mao
    Ding Ye
    BMC Medicine, 19
  • [45] Potatoes and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Schwingshackl, Lukas
    Schwedhelm, Carolina
    Hoffmann, Georg
    Boeing, Heiner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2019, 58 (06) : 2243 - 2251
  • [46] Heart rate variability in patients with anxiety disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheng, Ying-Chih
    Su, Min-, I
    Liu, Cheng-Wei
    Huang, Yu-Chen
    Huang, Wei-Lieh
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2022, 76 (07) : 292 - 302
  • [47] CT Scans and Cancer Risks: A Systematic Review and Dose-response Meta-analysis
    Chun-Feng Cao
    Kun-Long Ma
    Hua Shan
    Tang-Fen Liu
    Si-Qiao Zhao
    Yi Wan
    Hai-Qiang Jun-Zhang
    BMC Cancer, 22
  • [48] Chocolate and risk of chronic disease: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Morze, Jakub
    Schwedhelm, Carolina
    Bencic, Aleksander
    Hoffmann, Georg
    Boeing, Heiner
    Przybylowicz, Katarzyna
    Schwingshackl, Lukas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2020, 59 (01) : 389 - 397
  • [49] Coffee consumption and risk of fractures: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Lee, Dong Ryul
    Lee, Jungun
    Rota, Matteo
    Lee, Juneyoung
    Ahn, Hyeong Sik
    Park, Sang Min
    Shin, Doosup
    BONE, 2014, 63 : 20 - 28
  • [50] Impact of shift work on dementia: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Gao, Y.
    Fu, X.
    Hu, H.
    Li, T.
    Yuan, L.
    Zhang, J.
    Wu, Y.
    Wang, M.
    Ke, Y.
    Li, X.
    Hu, F.
    Zhang, M.
    Sun, L.
    Wen, H.
    Guan, R.
    Gao, P.
    Chai, W.
    Zhao, Y.
    Hu, D.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 223 : 80 - 86