Systematic review and meta-analysis: Dose-response curve of SSRIs and SNRIs in anxiety disorders

被引:61
|
作者
Jakubovski, Ewgeni [1 ]
Johnson, Jessica A. [2 ]
Nasir, Madeeha [2 ]
Mueller-Vahl, Kirsten [1 ]
Bloch, Michael H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Psychiat Social Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Hannover, Germany
[2] Yale Univ, Yale Sch Med, Yale Child Study Ctr, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
anxiety disorders; meta-analysis; panic disorder; serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; serotonin reuptake inhibitors; social anxiety disorder; tolerability; VENLAFAXINE EXTENDED-RELEASE; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GENERALIZED SOCIAL PHOBIA; DOUBLE-BLIND; PANIC DISORDER; PHARMACOLOGICAL-TREATMENTS; NONDEPRESSED OUTPATIENTS;
D O I
10.1002/da.22854
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe aimed to examine the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for anxiety disorders examining overall symptom improvement, likelihood of treatment response, time course of treatment response, individual pharmacological agent, diagnostic indication dose, and tolerability. MethodsWe searched PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials of SSRIs/SNRIs in adult patients with anxiety disorders that provided data at three or more time points. Extracted data included trial duration, weekly/biweekly anxiety scores for 12weeks. ResultsMeta-analysis included 57 trials (N=16,056). A linear mixed model analysis based on weekly outcome data suggested that for SNRI a logarithmic model offered the best fit compared to placebo (indicating the greatest incremental improvement from baseline occurred early in treatment); whereas for SSRI a linear model provided the best fit (indicating a similar improvement over the duration of the acute treatment phase). There were no significant differences in efficacy between pharmacological agents within each class or when comparing SSRIs to SNRIs. The greatest treatment benefits were observed for social anxiety disorder for both medication classes. Higher doses of SSRIs, but not SNRIs, were associated with significantly greater symptom improvement and likelihood of treatment response. For both medical classes, higher doses were associated with an increased likelihood of dropout due to side effects. ConclusionsSSRIs and SNRIs are effective in treating anxiety disorders. Higher doses of SSRIs within the therapeutic range are associated with greater treatment benefit, whereas higher doses of SNRIs are not.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 212
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy of psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Ponti, Nino
    Matbouriahi, Minoo
    Franco, Pamela
    Harrer, Mathias
    Miguel, Clara
    Papola, Davide
    Sicimoglu, Aysesu
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Karyotaki, Eirini
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2024, 104
  • [32] Primary headache disorders and body mass index categories: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis
    Martami, Fahimeh
    Jayedi, Ahmad
    Shab-Bidar, Sakineh
    HEADACHE, 2022, 62 (07): : 801 - 810
  • [33] Obsessive-compulsive disorder has a reduced placebo (and antidepressant) response compared to other anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis
    Sugarman, Michael A.
    Kirsch, Irving
    Huppert, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 218 : 217 - 226
  • [34] Dose-response relationship in music therapy for people with serious mental disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gold, Christian
    Solli, Hans Petter
    Krueger, Viggo
    Lie, Stein Atle
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 29 (03) : 193 - 207
  • [35] The dose-response curve in cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders
    Levy, Hannah C.
    Worden, Blaise L.
    Davies, Carolyn D.
    Stevens, Kimberly
    Katz, Benjamin W.
    Mammo, Liya
    Diefenbach, Gretchen J.
    Tolin, David F.
    COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY, 2020, 49 (06) : 439 - 454
  • [36] Meta-Analysis of the Relations of Anxiety Sensitivity to the Depressive and Anxiety Disorders
    Naragon-Gainey, Kristin
    PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (01) : 128 - 150
  • [37] Cortisol as a predictor of psychological therapy response in anxiety disorders Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fischer, Susanne
    Cleare, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2017, 47 : 60 - 68
  • [38] The efficacy of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy in treating depressive and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Sijbrandij, Marit
    Koole, Sander L.
    Andersson, Gerhard
    Beekman, Aartjan T.
    Reynolds, Charles F., III
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 12 (02) : 137 - 148
  • [39] Efficacy of treatments for anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis
    Bandelow, Borwin
    Reitt, Markus
    Roever, Christian
    Michaelis, Sophie
    Goerlich, Yvonne
    Wedekind, Dirk
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2015, 30 (04) : 183 - 192
  • [40] Social anxiety in the eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kerr-Gaffney, Jess
    Harrison, Amy
    Tchanturia, Kate
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (15) : 2477 - 2491