A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial Comparing the Pharmacokinetics of CT-P16, a Candidate Bevacizumab Biosimilar, with its Reference Product in Healthy Adult Males

被引:16
作者
Cho, Sang-Heon [1 ]
Han, Seunghoon [2 ]
Ghim, Jong-Lyul [3 ,4 ]
Nam, Moon-Suk [1 ]
Yu, Sunyoung [5 ]
Park, Taehong [5 ]
Kim, Sinhye [5 ]
Bae, Jihun [5 ]
Shin, Jae-Gook [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Inha Univ, Sch Med, Inha Univ Hosp, Incheon, South Korea
[2] Catholic Univ Korea, Seoul St Marys Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Busan, South Korea
[4] Inje Univ, Busan Paik Hosp, Busan, South Korea
[5] CELLTRION Inc, Incheon, South Korea
关键词
ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; CANCER; TARGET;
D O I
10.1007/s40259-019-00340-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCT-P16 is a candidate biosimilar of bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor that is used in the treatment of a range of advanced solid cancers.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic equivalence of CT-P16 and European Union (EU)-approved bevacizumab (EU-bevacizumab) and US-licensed bevacizumab (US-bevacizumab) reference products.MethodsIn this double-blind, parallel-group phaseI trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03247673), healthy adult males were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single dose of CT-P16 5mg/kg, EU-bevacizumab 5mg/kg, or US-bevacizumab 5mg/kg. Primary study endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity (AUC), AUC from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(last)), and maximum serum concentration (C-max). Pharmacokinetic equivalence was shown if the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean (GM) ratios of the AUC, AUC(last), and C-max were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80-125%. Safety and immunogenicity were also evaluated.ResultsA total of 144 subjects were randomized: 47 to CT-P16, 49 to EU-bevacizumab, and 48 to US-bevacizumab. The 90% CIs for the GM ratios of AUC, AUC(last), and C-max for CT-P16/EU-bevacizumab, CT-P16/US-bevacizumab, and EU-bevacizumab/US-bevacizumab comparisons were all within the bioequivalence margin. Mean serum concentration-time profiles, secondary pharmacokinetic parameters, and safety and immunogenicity profiles were comparable across all three treatment groups.ConclusionCT-P16 demonstrated pharmacokinetic equivalence to EU-bevacizumab and US-bevacizumab. Safety and immunogenicity profiles were similar for CT-P16, EU-bevacizumab, and US-bevacizumab. These data support the further clinical evaluation of CT-P16 as a bevacizumab biosimilar.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT03247673.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 181
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   The Impact of Bevacizumab (Avastin) on Survival in Metastatic Solid Tumors - A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review [J].
Amit, Limor ;
Ben-Aharon, Irit ;
Vidal, Liat ;
Leibovici, Leonard ;
Stemmer, Salomon .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01)
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, GUID SIM BIOL MED PR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Guidance for industry: scientific considerations in demonstrating biosimilarity to a reference product
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, AV PRESCR INF
[5]   Cellular abnormalities of blood vessels as targets in cancer [J].
Baluk, P ;
Hashizume, H ;
McDonald, DM .
CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 15 (01) :102-111
[6]   An introduction to biosimilar cancer therapeutics: definitions, rationale for development and regulatory requirements [J].
Buske, Christian ;
Ogura, Michinori ;
Kwon, Hyuk-Chan ;
Yoon, Sang Wook .
FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2017, 13 (15) :5-16
[7]  
European Medicines Agency, 2018, AV SUMM PROD CHAR
[8]  
European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, 2010, GUID INV BIOEQ
[9]   Bevacizumab [J].
Kazazi-Hyseni, Filis ;
Beijnen, Jos H. ;
Schellens, Jan H. M. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2010, 15 (08) :819-825
[10]   A phase I pharmacokinetics study comparing PF-06439535 (a potential biosimilar) with bevacizumab in healthy male volunteers [J].
Knight, Beverly ;
Rassam, Danielle ;
Liao, Shanmei ;
Ewesuedo, Reginald .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 77 (04) :839-846