Interventions to reduce prejudice and enhance inclusion and respect for ethnic differences in early childhood: A systematic review

被引:150
作者
Aboud, Frances E. [1 ]
Tredoux, Colin [2 ]
Tropp, Linda R. [3 ]
Brown, Christia Spears [4 ]
Niens, Ulrike [5 ]
Noor, Noraini M.
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[2] Univ Cape Town, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[3] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, NY USA
[4] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
[5] Queens Univ Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Prejudice reduction; Attitude change; Ethnic bias; Multicultural education; Intergroup relations; Children; Intervention; Program evaluation; CHILDRENS INTERGROUP ATTITUDES; IN-GROUP FAVORITISM; RACIAL-ATTITUDES; EUROPEAN-AMERICAN; EXTENDED CONTACT; YOUNG-CHILDREN; RACE; FRIENDSHIP; IDENTITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.dr.2012.05.001
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A systematic review was conducted of studies evaluating the effects of interventions aimed at reducing ethnic prejudice and discrimination in young children. Articles published between 1980 and 2010 and including children of 8 years and under were identified, harvested, and assessed for quality, both for the exposure/program as well as for the evaluation. In total, 32 studies (14 contact and 18 media or instruction) yielded 62 effects on attitudes and 59 effects on peer relations. An overall count of the positive (40%), non-significant (50%), and negative effects (10%) indicate a mixed picture. Overall, more attitude effects (55%) than peer relations effects (25%) were positive, and media/instruction (47%) was more successful than contact (36%). Most of the effects were observed with children from a majority ethnicity: 67% of the attitude effects were positive, and media/instruction and contact were equally effective at delivering these. Few differences were found as a function of the quality of the exposure and evaluation, but differences were found depending on the context of exposure (naturally occurring or experimental manipulation) and research design (random assignment or self-selection). In conclusion, the findings were more mixed than expected, though sufficiently strong studies exist to provide lessons for future research. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 336
页数:30
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Aboud F.E., 2007, Intergroup attitudes and relations in childhood through adulthood, P249
  • [2] Aboud F.E., 2000, REDUCING PREJUDICE D, P269
  • [3] Aboud F. E., SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT I
  • [4] Aboud F.E., 2002, PAPER PRESENTED AT T
  • [5] Aboud F.E., 2008, HDB RACE RACISM DEV, P55, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118269930.CH4
  • [6] The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children: Are they distinct attitudes?
    Aboud, FE
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 39 (01) : 48 - 60
  • [7] Does talk of race foster prejudice or tolerance in children?
    Aboud, FE
    Doyle, AB
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCE-REVUE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES DU COMPORTEMENT, 1996, 28 (03): : 161 - 170
  • [8] Cross-race peer relations and friendship quality
    Aboud, FE
    Mendelson, MJ
    Purdy, KT
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2003, 27 (02) : 165 - 173
  • [9] Friendship and identity in a language-integrated school
    Aboud, Frances E.
    Sankar, Janani
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 31 (05) : 445 - 453
  • [10] Aboud FE, 2005, ON THE NATURE OF PREJUDICE: FIFTY YEARS AFTER ALLPORT, P310, DOI 10.1002/9780470773963.ch19