Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases

被引:13
|
作者
Gao, ZL [1 ]
Shi, L [1 ]
Yang, MS [1 ]
Wang, L [1 ]
Yang, DD [1 ]
Sun, DK [1 ]
Liu, QZ [1 ]
Men, CP [1 ]
Wu, JT [1 ]
Zhang, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Urol, Yantai 264000, Peoples R China
关键词
kidney pelves; ureteral diseases; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1097/00029330-200605020-00008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with less trauma than open surgery is commonly performed for ureteropelvic junction obstruction despite a longer operating time and a long learning curve. We describe in this paper a new technique, which combines laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty, that we have developed in 51 patients and achieved excellent results. Methods The surgical procedure can be divided into two steps: laparoscopic dissection of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter transperitoneally; then accomplishing the pyeloplasty through the extended port incision above the ureteropelvic junction as in open surgery. Results All 51 operations were successful without conversion to open surgery. No intraoperative complications were observed. The operating time was 40 minutes to 90 minutes with an average of 57.5 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 15 ml to 30 nil with an average of 21.2 ml. Aberrant artery vessel and primary stricture as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was noted in 2 and 49 patients, respectively. Thirty-nine patients had fever to differing extents in the 4 days postoperation and no severe infection was observed. Four patients had urinary leakage with their drains being retained for 6 days, 6 days, 5 days or 8 days after the operation. The mean followup was 10.8 months (range 3 months to 36 months). The followup showed good results with symptom resolution in all the patients. Renal ultrasonography demonstrated that the average separation of the collecting systems decreased from preoperative 2.7 cm (range 2.0 cm to 4.7 cm) to postoperative 1.5 cm (range 1.0 cm. to 2.3 cm). Excretory urography at 3 months postoperatively showed improved drainage. Of the 51 patients, 35 underwent two or more excretory urograms, demonstrating stable renal function, improved drainage and no evidence of recurrent obstruction. At the last followup, visit, each patient was doing well. Conclusions Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty offers a simpler, timesaving method in a minimally invasive fashion with low morbidity for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ensuring quality of repair, the method provides a minimally invasive alternative with good results. It is worth future clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 844
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years
    Cascio, S.
    Tien, A.
    Chee, W.
    Tan, H. L.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (01) : 335 - 338
  • [22] Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A Versatile Alternative to Open Pyeloplasty
    Srivastava, Aneesh
    Singh, Pratipal
    Maheshwari, Ruchir
    Ansari, Mohd S.
    Dubey, Deepak
    Kapoor, Rakesh
    Kumar, Anant
    Mandhani, Anil
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2009, 83 (04) : 420 - 424
  • [23] Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with a novel technique of JJ stenting in children
    Yu, Jianhua
    Wu, Zhonghua
    Xu, Youming
    Li, Zhuo
    Wang, Jiansong
    Qi, Fan
    Chen, Xiang
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (05) : 756 - 759
  • [24] RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC DISMEMBERED FIBRIN-GLUED PYELOPLASTY - INITIAL REPORT
    EDEN, CG
    MURRAY, KHA
    MINIMALLY INVASIVE THERAPY, 1995, 4 (03): : 147 - 152
  • [25] Extraperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered fibrin glued pyeloplasty: medium-term results
    Eden, CG
    Sultana, SR
    Murray, KHA
    Carruthers, RK
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 80 (03): : 382 - 389
  • [26] Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children: experience of 226 cases at one centre
    Polok, Marcin
    Borselle, Dominika
    Toczewski, Krystian
    Apoznanski, Wojciech
    Jedrzejuk, Diana
    Patkowski, Dariusz
    ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 16 (04) : 858 - 862
  • [27] Retroperitoneoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Modification of the Procedure and Our Experience
    Ou, Zhen-yu
    Chen, Jin-bo
    Chen, Zhi
    Chen, Min-feng
    Liu, Long-fei
    Zhou, Xu
    Li, Yang-le
    Qi, Lin
    Zu, Xiong-bing
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2014, 11 (04) : 1763 - 1767
  • [28] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases
    Jarrett, TW
    Chan, DY
    Charambura, TC
    Fugita, O
    Kavoussi, LR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (03) : 1253 - 1256
  • [29] Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evaluation of 27 cases
    Inci, Kubilay
    Gudeloglu, Ahmet
    Yazici, Sertac
    Ergen, Ali
    Bilen, Cenk Yucel
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 35 (01): : 11 - 16
  • [30] Passing from open to robotic surgery for dismembered pyeloplasty: a single centre experience
    Di Gregorio, Marcelo
    Botnaru, Andrei
    Bairy, Laurent
    Lorge, Francis
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2014, 3 : 1 - 7