Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases

被引:13
|
作者
Gao, ZL [1 ]
Shi, L [1 ]
Yang, MS [1 ]
Wang, L [1 ]
Yang, DD [1 ]
Sun, DK [1 ]
Liu, QZ [1 ]
Men, CP [1 ]
Wu, JT [1 ]
Zhang, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Urol, Yantai 264000, Peoples R China
关键词
kidney pelves; ureteral diseases; laparoscopy;
D O I
10.1097/00029330-200605020-00008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty with less trauma than open surgery is commonly performed for ureteropelvic junction obstruction despite a longer operating time and a long learning curve. We describe in this paper a new technique, which combines laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty, that we have developed in 51 patients and achieved excellent results. Methods The surgical procedure can be divided into two steps: laparoscopic dissection of the renal pelvis and proximal ureter transperitoneally; then accomplishing the pyeloplasty through the extended port incision above the ureteropelvic junction as in open surgery. Results All 51 operations were successful without conversion to open surgery. No intraoperative complications were observed. The operating time was 40 minutes to 90 minutes with an average of 57.5 minutes. The estimated blood loss was 15 ml to 30 nil with an average of 21.2 ml. Aberrant artery vessel and primary stricture as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction was noted in 2 and 49 patients, respectively. Thirty-nine patients had fever to differing extents in the 4 days postoperation and no severe infection was observed. Four patients had urinary leakage with their drains being retained for 6 days, 6 days, 5 days or 8 days after the operation. The mean followup was 10.8 months (range 3 months to 36 months). The followup showed good results with symptom resolution in all the patients. Renal ultrasonography demonstrated that the average separation of the collecting systems decreased from preoperative 2.7 cm (range 2.0 cm to 4.7 cm) to postoperative 1.5 cm (range 1.0 cm. to 2.3 cm). Excretory urography at 3 months postoperatively showed improved drainage. Of the 51 patients, 35 underwent two or more excretory urograms, demonstrating stable renal function, improved drainage and no evidence of recurrent obstruction. At the last followup, visit, each patient was doing well. Conclusions Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty offers a simpler, timesaving method in a minimally invasive fashion with low morbidity for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Ensuring quality of repair, the method provides a minimally invasive alternative with good results. It is worth future clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:840 / 844
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY IN 47 CASES
    Mitre, Anuar Ibrahim
    Brito, Artur Henrique
    Srougi, Miguel
    CLINICS, 2008, 63 (05) : 631 - 636
  • [3] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: 50 consecutive cases
    Eden, CG
    Cahill, D
    Allen, JD
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (06) : 526 - 531
  • [4] LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY - PRELIMINARY-REPORT
    RECKER, F
    SUBOTIC, B
    GOEPEL, M
    TSCHOLL, R
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05) : 1601 - 1604
  • [5] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children
    Reddy, M
    Nerli, RB
    Bashetty, R
    Ravish, IR
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02) : 700 - 702
  • [6] Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty of a Retrocaval Ureter: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Chung, Benjamin I.
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (06) : 1433 - 1436
  • [7] Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Comparison with a cohort of open surgery
    Lee, RS
    Retik, AB
    Borer, JG
    Peters, CA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (02) : 683 - 687
  • [8] Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty by a retroperitoneal approach in children
    El-Ghoneimi, A
    Farhat, W
    Bolduc, S
    Bagli, D
    McLorie, G
    Aigrain, Y
    Khoury, A
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (01) : 104 - 108
  • [9] Open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: review of our series and description of our laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure
    Bestard Vallejo, Juan E.
    Cecchini Rosell, Lluis
    Raventos Busquets, Carles Xavier
    Trilla Herrera, Enrique
    Tremps Velazquez, Edmundo
    Morote Robles, Juan
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2009, 33 (09): : 994 - 999
  • [10] Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction
    Zhang, Xu
    Li, Hong-Zhao
    Ma, Xin
    Zheng, Tao
    Lang, Bin
    Zhang, Jun
    Fu, Bin
    Xu, Kai
    Guo, Xiao-Lin
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (03) : 1077 - 1080