A Comparative Needle Study: EUS-FNA Procedures Using the HD ProCore™ and EchoTip® 22-Gauge Needle Types

被引:63
作者
Witt, Benjamin L. [1 ,2 ]
Adler, Douglas G. [3 ]
Hilden, Kristen [3 ]
Layfield, Lester J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] ARUP Labs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Dept Internal Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
关键词
FNA; pancreas; needle; adequacy; SOLID PANCREATIC MASSES; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; TRUCUT NEEDLE; GUIDED FNA; FREQUENCY; COMPLICATIONS; HEMORRHAGE; CANCER;
D O I
10.1002/dc.22971
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The specific needle sizes/types used in performing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspirations (EUS-FNA) vary. The HD ProCore (TM) is a 22-gauge beveled needle allowing for core biopsy along with aspiration material. In this study we compare this needle with a standard 22-gauge needle. Between April 1, 2011 and November 15, 2011, 18 patients undergoing EUS-FNA using the HD ProCore (TM) needle were compared to a control group of 18 cases using the standard 22-gauge needle. Smears were assessed for: three-dimensional clusters, thick obscuring clusters, monolayer sheets, cellularity, crowded obscuring single cells, blood, and nuclear staining. Cell blocks were assessed for cellularity and presence of diagnostic material. Records were reviewed for the overall adequacy, number of FNA passes, and patient follow-up. Overall, the two needle groups demonstrated similar results for the cytology parameters, amount of diagnostic cell block material, adequacy, and accuracy. The mean number of passes to achieve adequacy varied between the groups [2.94 for the standard 22-gauge needle group versus 2.11 for the beveled needle group (P=0.03)] with no meaningful difference in case duration between needle groups. No complications were reported. The beveled EUS needle affords similar cytologic interpretability, adequacy, diagnostic accuracy, and amount of cell block material as a standard needle. There was a statistically significant trend toward fewer passes to achieve adequacy with the beveled EUS-FNA needle. Therefore, the EUS-FNA needle with a lateral bevel is a diagnostically similar alternative to standard endoscopy needles, the possibility that this beveled needle may improve per pass adequacy requires further verification. (C) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1074
页数:6
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Acute extraluminal hemorrhage associated with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: frequency and clinical significance [J].
Affi, A ;
Vazquez-Sequeiros, E ;
Norton, ID ;
Clain, JE ;
Wiersema, MJ .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (02) :221-225
[2]   Frequency of major complications after EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective evaluation [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Tamhane, A ;
Varadarajulu, S ;
Wilcox, CM .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 63 (04) :622-629
[3]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Chen, VK ;
Eltoum, IA ;
Jhala, D ;
Chhieng, DC ;
Jhala, N ;
Vickers, SM ;
Wilcox, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) :2663-2668
[4]   Endoscopic ultrasonography - Guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer [J].
Gress, F ;
Gottlieb, K ;
Sherman, S ;
Lehman, G .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (06) :459-464
[5]   Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Wiersema, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (06) :1386-1391
[6]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and trucut biopsy in gastroenterology - An overview [J].
Jenssen, Christian ;
Dietrich, Christoph F. .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) :743-759
[7]   Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses [J].
Sakamoto, Hiroki ;
Kitano, Masayuki ;
Komaki, Takamitsu ;
Noda, Kazu ;
Chikugo, Takaaki ;
Dote, Kensaku ;
Takeyama, Yoshifumi ;
Das, Kunal ;
Yamao, Kenji ;
Kudo, Masatoshi .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 24 (03) :384-390
[8]   EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement [J].
Savides, Thomas J. ;
Donohue, Michael ;
Hunt, Gordon ;
Al-Haddad, Mohammed ;
Aslanian, Harry ;
Ben-Menachem, Tamir ;
Chen, Victor K. ;
Coyle, Walter ;
Deutsch, John ;
DeWitt, John ;
Dhawan, Manish ;
Eckardt, Alexander ;
Eloubeidi, Mohamad ;
Esker, Alec ;
Gordon, Stuart R. ;
Gress, Frank ;
Ikenberry, Steven ;
Joyce, Ann Marie ;
Klapman, Jason ;
Lo, Simon ;
Maluf-Fillho, Fauze ;
Nickl, Nicholas ;
Singh, Virmeet ;
Wills, Jason ;
Behling, Cynthia .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (02) :277-282
[9]   EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles [J].
Siddiqui, Uzma D. ;
Rossi, Federico ;
Rosenthal, Lawrence S. ;
Padda, Manmeet S. ;
Murali-Dharan, Visvanathan ;
Aslanian, Harry R. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (06) :1093-1097
[10]   Advantage of EUS Trucut biopsy combined with fine-needle aspiration without immediate on-site cytopathologic examination [J].
Storch, Ian ;
Jorda, Merce ;
Thurer, Richard ;
Raez, Luis ;
Rocha-Lima, Caio ;
Vernon, Stephen ;
Ribeiro, Afonso .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2006, 64 (04) :505-511