Carbon dioxide emissions and trade: Evidence from disaggregate trade data

被引:114
作者
Kim, Dong-Hyeon [1 ]
Suen, Yu-Bo [2 ]
Lin, Shu-Chin [3 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Food & Resource Econ, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul 136701, South Korea
[2] Aletheia Univ, Dept Finance & Banking, 32 Zhenli St, New Taipei 25103, Taiwan
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Dept Econ, 25-2 SungKyunKwan Ro, Seoul 03063, South Korea
关键词
CO2; emissions; International trade; Quantile effects; POLLUTION HAVEN HYPOTHESIS; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE; QUANTILE REGRESSION; POLICY FORMATION; ENVIRONMENT; LIBERALIZATION; CORRUPTION; INFERENCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.019
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The relationship between trade and environmental quality is a major controversial issue. The paper intends to provide robust evidence and new insights into the discussion. Specifically, it examines the effect of trade on carbon dioxide emissions (CO2) systematically in a North-North, North-South, South-North, and South-South context. It employs a panel data instrumental-variable quantile approach to control for endogeneity and account for potential (quantile) parameter heterogeneity. Some important results emerge. First, trade with the North increases CO2 emissions whereas trade with the South mitigates CO2 emissions with a relatively larger effect for less polluted host countries. Second, for advanced countries, their trade with the South or the North leads to a reduction in CO2 emissions, the effect that seems relatively stronger for less polluted advanced countries. Third, for developing countries, their trade with the North worsens CO2 emissions whereas their trade with the South mitigates CO2 emissions with a larger effect for less polluted developing countries. Last, the environmental Kuznets hypothesis is also detected across quantiles for the full sample and both developing and advanced countries subsamples. The findings suggest that trade benefits the advanced countries but could hurt the developing countries when trade with high-income trading partners occurs, in terms of CO2 emissions. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 28
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Rents, competition, and corruption [J].
Ades, A ;
Di Tella, R .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1999, 89 (04) :982-993
[2]   Re-exploring the Trade and Environment Nexus Through the Diffusion of Pollution [J].
Aklin, Michael .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 64 (04) :663-682
[3]   CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China [J].
Ang, James B. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) :2658-2665
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, QUANTILE TREATMENT E
[5]   Is free trade good for the environment? [J].
Antweiler, W ;
Copeland, BR ;
Taylor, MS .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) :877-908
[6]   The environmental consequences of globalization: A country-specific time-series analysis [J].
Baek, Jungho ;
Cho, Yongsung ;
Koo, Won W. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (8-9) :2255-2264
[7]   A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950-2010 [J].
Barro, Robert J. ;
Lee, Jong Wha .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2013, 104 :184-198
[8]   Effects of political institutions on air quality [J].
Bernauer, Thomas ;
Koubi, Vally .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (05) :1355-1365
[9]   A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data [J].
Canay, Ivan A. .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2011, 14 (03) :368-386
[10]   Instrumental variable quantile regression: A robust inference approach [J].
Chernozhukov, Victor ;
Hansen, Christian .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 142 (01) :379-398