Strategic life cycle decision-making for the management of complex Systems subject to uncertain environmental policy

被引:13
作者
Niese, Nathan D. [1 ]
Singer, David J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Naval Architecture & Marine Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Markov decision; Environmental policy; Life cycle cost; Shipping and the environment; EMISSIONS; OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY; FORMULATION; REDUCTION; SCENARIOS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.07.020
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
Environmental regulations play a significant role in ship design, manufacturing, operations, and disposal. As the life cycle progresses, a ship's environmental performance can degrade if more stringent policies are implemented at a port of call or for operations on the open seas. Tightened constraints over time may increase life cycle cost due to mandated replacement and repair costs, larger insurance premiums, or less operational flexibility. Unless design and maintenance activities account for uncertainty related to the environmental policy agenda, regulation changes can present considerable economic, operational, and mission-based risks to the life cycle of a vessel. The optimal design and maintenance strategy for time-dependent environmental compliance can be determined via the use of a sequential decision-making framework known as a Markov decision process (MDP). The purpose of the presented research is to demonstrate the application of a non-stationary MDP to the design and maintenance decisions of a ship that must consider ballast water exchange and treatment policy changes. Research efforts outline the preliminary approach, outcomes, and conclusions resulting from the use of a MDP to model life cycle decisions. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 374
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[41]  
Sornette D, 2006, FRONTIERS COLL, P95
[42]   Life cycle optimization of ownership costs and emissions reduction in US vehicle retirement decisions [J].
Spitzley, DV ;
Grande, DE ;
Keoleian, GA ;
Kim, HC .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 10 (02) :161-175
[43]   FORMULATION OF THE DRIFT RELIABILITY OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM [J].
STYBLINSKI, MA .
MICROELECTRONICS AND RELIABILITY, 1991, 31 (01) :159-171
[44]  
Sussman J., 2000, INTRO TRANSPORTATION
[45]  
Teece DavidJ., 2011, DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, VSecond
[46]  
Thi P., 2010, EUROPEAN SAFETY RELI
[47]  
van Noortwijk J.M., 2007, RELIAB ENG SYST SAFE, V94, P2
[48]   Optimal fleetwide emissions reductions for passenger ferries: An application of a mixed-integer nonlinear programming model for the New York-New Jersey Harbor [J].
Winebrake, JJ ;
Corbett, JJ ;
Wang, CF ;
Farrell, AE ;
Woods, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2005, 55 (04) :458-466