Incident reporting behaviours following the Francis report: A cross-sectional survey

被引:14
|
作者
Archer, Gareth [1 ]
Colhoun, Alison [2 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, ST7 Anaesthet, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
behaviour; error; governance; incident; patient safety; reporting; BARRIERS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12849
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims, and objectivesPrevious studies have shown a lack of engagement in the reporting process. There is limited evidence about whether attitudes and behaviours of doctors in the UK towards incident reporting have changed following the events at Mid Staffordshire National Health Service Foundation Trust and the recommendations that followed. We conducted a relatively large survey of doctors, aiming to assess whether doctors recognised incidents and reported them accordingly, along with their behaviours towards reporting and their suggestions of how incident reporting may be improved. MethodsA cross-sectional survey of doctors was undertaken in 11 hospitals in the north of England. The participants (n=581) were invited to take part in an electronic questionnaire. Demographics were obtained, and engagement with the incident reporting process was assessed, including an estimate of the number of incidents which were witnessed but not actually reported. Factors which influenced reporting behaviours were recorded. Free-text comments were encouraged. A mixed method analysis of the responses was performed. ResultsDoctors do not appear to be engaging with the incident reporting processin particular, junior doctors. The main reason given for not completing forms was not having enough time (38.2% of respondents), primarily due to the length and complexity of forms. Many doctors, 43.7%, witnessed more than 5 incidents, but only 13.3% of doctors submitted more than 5 reports. Free text comments revealed 4 themes which impact upon reporting behaviours: organisational issues, form structure, a culture of blame, and a lack of feedback. Several suggestions for improvement were made. ConclusionsLittle has changed in the attitudes and behaviours of doctors. Improving incident reporting form structure to make it more user-friendly and improving feedback may engage doctors and lead to an improved safety culture. The way the medical profession reports serious and other incidents still needs to be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A cross-sectional survey of the Maltese general public on medication wastage
    Lorna Marie West
    Lesley Diack
    Maria Cordina
    Derek Stewart
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2016, 38 : 261 - 270
  • [42] A cross-sectional survey of nursing students' patient safety knowledge
    Levett-Jones, Tracy
    Andersen, Patrea
    Bogossian, Fiona
    Cooper, Simon
    Guinea, Stephen
    Hopmans, Ruben
    McKenna, Lisa
    Pich, Jacqui
    Reid-Searl, Kerry
    Seaton, Philippa
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 88
  • [43] Determinants of successful guideline implementation: a national cross-sectional survey
    Ying-hui Jin
    Li-Ming Tan
    Khalid S. Khan
    Tong Deng
    Chao Huang
    Fei Han
    Jing Zhang
    Qiao Huang
    Di Huang
    Dan-qi Wang
    Yu Wang
    Xian-tao Zeng
    Qiang Wang
    Xing-huan Wang
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21
  • [44] A cross-sectional survey of the Maltese general public on medication wastage
    West, Lorna Marie
    Diack, Lesley
    Cordina, Maria
    Stewart, Derek
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2016, 38 (02) : 261 - 270
  • [45] Benefits, barriers, and facilitators of using speech recognition technology in nursing documentation and reporting: A cross-sectional study
    Dinari, Fatemeh
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Bassiri, Somayyeh
    Mashouf, Esmat
    Bastaminejad, Saiyad
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (06)
  • [46] Vaccination survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study
    Feuchtenberger, Martin
    Kleinert, Stefan
    Schwab, Sven
    Roll, Petra
    Scharbatke, Eva Christina
    Ostermeier, Eva
    Voll, Reinhard E.
    Schaefer, Arne
    Tony, Hans-Peter
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 32 (06) : 1533 - 1539
  • [47] Reporting & Fate of ADEs at a Tertiary Academic Hospital setting: Cross-Sectional Study
    Almetwazi, Mansour S.
    Mansy, Wael
    Alshamrani, Majd
    Alrouwajieh, Sara
    Aljawadi, Mohammad
    ARCHIVES OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2020, 11 (03) : 27 - 31
  • [48] Experiences and preferences for advance care planning following a diagnosis of dementia: Findings from a cross-sectional survey of carers
    Bryant, Jamie
    Mansfield, Elise
    Cameron, Emilie
    Sanson-Fisher, Rob
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [49] Reporting incidents involving the use of advanced medical technologies by nurses in home care: a cross-sectional survey and an analysis of registration data
    ten Haken, Ingrid
    Allouch, Somaya Ben
    van Harten, Wim H.
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2021, 30 (05) : 380 - 387
  • [50] Knowledge and Perceptions of Nurse Practitioners on Adverse Events Following Immunization and Barriers to Reporting in the Central Region, Eritrea: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Abdu, Nuru
    Mosazghi, Asmerom
    Yehdego, Tedros
    Tesfamariam, Eyasu H.
    Russom, Mulugeta
    DRUG HEALTHCARE AND PATIENT SAFETY, 2022, 14 : 125 - 134