Incident reporting behaviours following the Francis report: A cross-sectional survey

被引:15
作者
Archer, Gareth [1 ]
Colhoun, Alison [2 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Sheffield Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, ST7 Anaesthet, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
behaviour; error; governance; incident; patient safety; reporting; BARRIERS; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12849
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims, and objectivesPrevious studies have shown a lack of engagement in the reporting process. There is limited evidence about whether attitudes and behaviours of doctors in the UK towards incident reporting have changed following the events at Mid Staffordshire National Health Service Foundation Trust and the recommendations that followed. We conducted a relatively large survey of doctors, aiming to assess whether doctors recognised incidents and reported them accordingly, along with their behaviours towards reporting and their suggestions of how incident reporting may be improved. MethodsA cross-sectional survey of doctors was undertaken in 11 hospitals in the north of England. The participants (n=581) were invited to take part in an electronic questionnaire. Demographics were obtained, and engagement with the incident reporting process was assessed, including an estimate of the number of incidents which were witnessed but not actually reported. Factors which influenced reporting behaviours were recorded. Free-text comments were encouraged. A mixed method analysis of the responses was performed. ResultsDoctors do not appear to be engaging with the incident reporting processin particular, junior doctors. The main reason given for not completing forms was not having enough time (38.2% of respondents), primarily due to the length and complexity of forms. Many doctors, 43.7%, witnessed more than 5 incidents, but only 13.3% of doctors submitted more than 5 reports. Free text comments revealed 4 themes which impact upon reporting behaviours: organisational issues, form structure, a culture of blame, and a lack of feedback. Several suggestions for improvement were made. ConclusionsLittle has changed in the attitudes and behaviours of doctors. Improving incident reporting form structure to make it more user-friendly and improving feedback may engage doctors and lead to an improved safety culture. The way the medical profession reports serious and other incidents still needs to be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 368
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], WHAT IS PAT SAF INC
[2]   Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety [J].
Benn, J. ;
Koutantji, M. ;
Wallace, L. ;
Spurgeon, P. ;
Rejman, M. ;
Healey, A. ;
Vincent, C. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2009, 18 (01) :11-U33
[3]  
Boaden R., 2008, QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
[4]  
Department of Health, 2000, ORG MEM
[5]  
Employment Appeal Tribunal, 2016, EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TR
[6]   Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study [J].
Evans, SM ;
Berry, JG ;
Smith, BJ ;
Esterman, A ;
Selim, P ;
O'Shaughnessy, J ;
DeWit, M .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (01) :39-43
[7]   Evaluation of an intervention incident aimed at improving voluntary incident reporting in hospitals [J].
Evans, Sue M. ;
Smith, Brian J. ;
Esterman, Adrian ;
Runciman, William B. ;
Maddern, Guy ;
Stead, Karen ;
Selim, Pam ;
O'Shaughnessy, Jane ;
Muecke, Sandy ;
Jones, Sue .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2007, 16 (03) :169-175
[8]   Adverse-event-reporting practices by US hospitals: results of a national survey [J].
Farley, D. O. ;
Haviland, A. ;
Champagne, S. ;
Jain, A. K. ;
Battles, J. B. ;
Munier, W. B. ;
Loeb, J. M. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (06) :416-423
[9]   Barriers to incident reporting [J].
Firth-Cozens, J .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (01) :7-7
[10]  
Francis R., 2013, REP MIDST NHS FDN TR, DOI DOI 10.7748/NS2013.07.27.48.30.S42