Intensity modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost vs. conventional radiotherapy with sequential boost for breast cancer - A preliminary result

被引:23
作者
Lee, Hsin-Hua [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Ming-Feng [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Chuang, Hung-Yi [6 ]
Huang, Ming-Yii [1 ,3 ]
Tsuei, Le-Ping [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Fang-Ming [4 ]
Ou-Yang, Fu [4 ]
Huang, Chih-Jen [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Antai Tian Sheng Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pingtung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Fac Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ Kaohsiung Med Univ Joint Re, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[6] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Fac Dept Publ Hlth, Coll Hlth Sci, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
Breast cancer; IMRT; Simultaneous integrated boost; Radiotherapy; Radiation dermatitis; Skin reaction; HIGH-RISK PREMENOPAUSAL; 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; RADIATION-THERAPY; POSTOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; WOMEN; IMRT; MASTECTOMY; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/j.breast.2015.08.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: This study was aimed to assess the acute dermatological adverse effect from two distinct RT techniques for breast cancer patients. We compared intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) and conventional radiotherapy followed by sequential boost (CRT-SB). Methods: The study population was composed of 126 consecutive female breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery. Sixty-six patients received IMRT-SIB to 2 dose levels simultaneously. They received 50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction to the whole breast and 60.2 Gy at 2.15 Gy per fraction to the tumor bed by integral boost. Sixty patients in the CRT-SB group received 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the whole breast followed by a boost irradiation to tumor bed in 5-7 fractions to a total dose of 60-64 Gy. Acute skin toxicities were documented in agreement with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3 (CTCAE v.3.0). Results: Ninety-eight patients had grade 1 radiation dermatitis while 14 patients had grade 2. Among those with grade 2, there were 3 patients in IMRT-SIB group (4.5%) while 11 in CRT-SB group (18.3%). (P = 0.048) There was no patient with higher than grade 2 toxicity. Three year local control was 99.2%, 3-year disease free survival was 97.5% and 3-year overall survival was 99.2%. Conclusions: A significant reduction in the severity of acute radiation dermatitis from IMRT-SIB comparing with CRT-SB is demonstrated. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 660
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Simultaneous integrated boost for adjuvant treatment of breast cancer- intensity modulated vs. conventional radiotherapy: The IMRT-MC2 trial [J].
Askoxylakis, Vasileios ;
Jensen, Alexandra D. ;
Haefner, Matthias F. ;
Fetzner, Leonie ;
Sterzing, Florian ;
Heil, Joerg ;
Sohn, Christof ;
Huesing, Johannes ;
Tiefenbacher, Uta ;
Wenz, Frederik ;
Debus, Juergen ;
Hof, Holger .
BMC CANCER, 2011, 11
[2]   Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer:: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC 22881-10882 trial [J].
Bartelink, Harry ;
Horiot, Jean-Claude ;
Poortmans, Philip M. ;
Struikmans, Henk ;
Van den Bogaert, Walter ;
Fourquet, Alain ;
Jager, Jos J. ;
Hoogenraad, Willem J. ;
Oei, S. Bing ;
Warlam-Rodenhuis, Carla C. ;
Pierart, Marianne ;
Collette, Laurence .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (22) :3259-3265
[3]   Randomised trial of standard 2D radiotherapy (RT) versus intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients prescribed breast radiotherapy [J].
Donovan, Ellen ;
Bleakley, Natalie ;
Denholm, Erica ;
Evans, Phil ;
Gothard, Lone ;
Hanson, Jane ;
Peckitt, Clare ;
Reise, Stephanie ;
Ross, Gill ;
Sharp, Grace ;
Symonds-Tayler, Richard ;
Tait, Diana ;
Yarnold, John .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (03) :254-264
[4]  
Fernando IN, 2000, CLIN ONCOL-UK, V12, P158
[5]   Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[6]   IMRT for breast.: A planning study [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Nicolini, G ;
Alber, M ;
Asell, M ;
Dobler, B ;
El-Haddad, M ;
Hårdemark, B ;
Jelen, U ;
Kania, A ;
Larsson, M ;
Lohr, F ;
Munger, T ;
Negri, E ;
Rodrigues, C ;
Cozzi, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 (03) :300-310
[7]   Critical appraisal of treatment techniques based on conventional photon beams, intensity modulated photon beams and proton beams for therapy of intact breast [J].
Fogliata, A ;
Bolsi, A ;
Cozzi, L .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (02) :137-145
[8]  
Franco P, 2013, J CANCER RES CLIN, V139, P1927
[9]   Intensity-modulated and hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost adjuvant breast radiation employing statics ports of tomotherapy (TomoDirect): a prospective phase II trial [J].
Franco, Pierfrancesco ;
Zeverino, Michele ;
Migliaccio, Fernanda ;
Cante, Domenico ;
Sciacero, Piera ;
Borca, Valeria Casanova ;
Torielli, Paolo ;
Arrichiello, Cecilia ;
Girelli, Giuseppe ;
La Porta, Maria Rosa ;
Tofani, Santi ;
Numico, Gianmauro ;
Ricardi, Umberto .
JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 140 (01) :167-177
[10]   Simultaneous integrated boost for breast cancer using IMRT: A radiobiological and treatment planning study [J].
Guerrero, M ;
Li, XA ;
Earl, MA ;
Sarfaraz, M ;
Kiggundu, E .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (05) :1513-1522