The effects of feedback explicitness and type of target structure on accuracy in revision and new pieces of writing

被引：64

作者：

Suzuki, Wataru ^{[1
]}

Nassaji, Hossein ^{[2
]}

Sato, Konosuke ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Miyagi Univ Educ, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan

[2] Univ Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada

[3] Tenn Minami Jr High Sch, Ibaraki, Japan

来源：

SYSTEM | 2019年 / 81卷

关键词：

Degree of explicitness; Written corrective feedback; Revision; New pieces of writing; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; GRAMMAR-CORRECTION; ERROR; ACQUISITION; EFFICACY; ENGLISH;

D O I：

10.1016/j.system.2018.12.017

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

This study examines the interactional effect of written corrective feedback (WCF) explicitness and type of target structure on the accuracy of students' revision and new pieces of writing. A total of 88 Japanese university students of English were assigned to four groups, each receiving either direct or indirect corrective feedback that differed in its degree of feedback explicitness: Direct corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanation (DCF + ME), direct corrective feedback only (DCF), indirect corrective feedback with metalinguistic explanation (ICF + ME), and indirect corrective feedback only (ICF). The target structures were the English indefinite article and the past perfect tense. While both types of WCF enabled the learners to improve the accuracy of both target structures in revision, a significant improvement from the first writing to the new writing was only found for the past perfect. A significant effect was partially found of WCF explicitness on learner revision for the past perfect, but not on new pieces of writing regardless of the type of target structures. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：135 / 145

页数：11

共 43 条

[1]

[Anonymous], INTERACTIONAL FEEDBA

[2]

Ashwell T., 2000, J SECOND LANG WRIT, V9, P227, DOI 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00027-8

[3] The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J].

Bitchener, J ;

Young, S ;

Cameron, D .

JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2005, 14 (03) :191-205

[4]

Bitchener J., 2012, Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing

[5] Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].

Bitchener, John .

JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118

[6] Written corrective feedback studies: Approximate replication of Bitchener & Knoch (2010a) and Van Beuningen, De Jong & Kuiken (2012) [J].

Bitchener, John ;

Knoch, Ute .

LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2015, 48 (03) :405-414

[7] The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation [J].

Bitchener, John ;

Knoch, Ute .

APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2010, 31 (02) :193-214

[8] The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback [J].

Bitchener, John ;

Knoch, Ute .

SYSTEM, 2009, 37 (02) :322-329

[9] The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback [J].

Bitchener, John ;

Knoch, Ute .

ELT JOURNAL, 2009, 63 (03) :204-211

[10] The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing [J].

Chandler, J .

JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2003, 12 (03) :267-296

← 1 2 3 4 5 →