Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars

被引:43
|
作者
Ruiz, R. A. [1 ]
Bertero, H. D.
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Dpto Prod Vegetal, Fac Agron, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
关键词
quinoa; Chenopodium quinoa; extinction coefficient; RUE; LAI;
D O I
10.1016/j.eja.2008.05.003
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Sea level quinoas are grown at low altitudes in Central and Southern Chile. Both sensitivity to photoperiod and response to temperature largely determine quinoa adaptation, but crop biomass production must be quantified to evaluate agronomic performance. The objectives of this work are: (i) to characterize development effects on leaf area evolution for genotypes of sea level quinoa differing in cycle length, (ii) to quantify the extinction coefficient (k) for photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and radiation use efficiency (RUE) from emergence up to the beginning of grain filling and (iii) to identify which crop attributes related to canopy architecture should be considered to improve biomass production. Four cultivars (NL-6, RU-5, CO-407 and Faro) were cropped in Pergamino (33 degrees 56'S, 60 degrees 35'W, 65 m a.s.l.), Argentina, at three densities (from 22 to 66 plants m(-2)) in two consecutive years under field conditions with adequate water and nutrient supply. Thermal time to first anthesis and maximum leaf number on the main stem were linearly correlated (r(2) = 0.87; p < 0.0001). Leaf area continued to increase during the flowering phase, notably in NL-6, the earliest genotype. There were significant differences in maximum plant leaf area between cultivars. Increasing density reduced plant leaf area but effects were comparatively small. Estimated k was 0.59 +/- 0.02 across genotypes and was higher (p < 0.05) for 66 plants m(-2). Values for RUE changed as cumulative intercepted PAR (IPAR) increased; at initial stages of development RUE was 1.25 +/- 0.09 g MJ IPAR(-1), but if cumulative IPAR was higher than 107.5 +/- 10.4 MJ IPAR m(-2), RUE was 2.68 +/- 10.15 g MJ IPAR(-1). That change occurred when leaf area index (LAI) and fraction of PAR intercepted were still low and ranged from 0.61 to 1.38 and from 0.33 to 0.51, respectively. No significant association was found with any developmental stage. Our results agreed to the notion that RUE variation during pre-anthesis phases is largely determined by LAI through its effect on radiation distribution within the canopy. Biomass production could be improved if periods of interception below 50% of incoming PAR were reduced to ensure high RUE. This seems to be possible in temperate areas both by the use of late genotypes with a higher number of leaves on the main stem and by early genotypes provided adequate plant density is chosen. Early increment in LAI and overlapping of the leaf area increase period with the flowering phase are desirable strategies for earliest genotypes to maximize yield. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Light interception and radiation use efficiency in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Hosseini, Seyed Hosssein
    Karizaki, Ali Rahemi
    Moghadam, Ali Nakhzari
    Biabani, Abbas
    Taliei, Fakhtak
    CROP SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (04) : 2438 - 2449
  • [2] Aerodynamic properties of two quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Caetano, Jordana Moura
    Devilla, Ivano Alessandro
    Melo, Pamella de Carvalho
    Servulo, Ana Claudia Oliveira
    Ferreira, Rafael Batista
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS-AGRARIA, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [3] Reproductive partitioning in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Bertero, H. D.
    Ruiz, R. A.
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2010, 118 (01) : 94 - 101
  • [4] Ecdysteroids of Quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Zhu, N
    Kikuzaki, H
    Vastano, BC
    Nakatani, N
    Karwe, MV
    Rosen, RT
    Ho, CT
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2001, 49 (05) : 2576 - 2578
  • [5] The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Jacobsen, SE
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (1-2) : 167 - 177
  • [6] Glycaemic properties of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.).
    Zevallos, V.
    Grimble, G.
    Herencia, L. I.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NUTRITION SOCIETY, 2006, 65 : 60A - 60A
  • [7] Determination of seed number in sea level quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars
    Bertero, H. D.
    Ruiz, R. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2008, 28 (03) : 186 - 194
  • [8] Distribution of minerals in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seeds
    Konishi, Y
    Hirano, S
    Tsuboi, H
    Wada, M
    BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2004, 68 (01) : 231 - 234
  • [9] Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)
    Adolf, Verena Isabelle
    Jacobsen, Sven-Erik
    Shabala, Sergey
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2013, 92 : 43 - 54
  • [10] Adaptation of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to Australian Environments
    Snowball, Richard
    Dhammu, Harmohinder S.
    D'Antuono, Mario Francesco
    Troldahl, David
    Biggs, Ian
    Thompson, Callen
    Warmington, Mark
    Pearce, Amanda
    Sharma, Darshan L.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (09):