Feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness of patient participation at bedside shift reporting: mixed-method research protocol

被引:19
作者
Malfait, Simon [1 ,2 ]
Eeckloo, Kristof [2 ,3 ]
Lust, Elisa [2 ]
Van Biesen, Wim [4 ,5 ]
Van Hecke, Ann [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, UCVV, Dept Publ Hlth, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Ghent Univ Hosp, Strateg Policy Cell, Ghent, Belgium
[4] Ghent Univ Hosp, Renal Dept, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Univ Ghent, Dept Internal Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Ghent, Belgium
[6] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Ghent, Belgium
关键词
appropriateness; bedside shift report; effectiveness; feasibility; meaningfulness; mixed methods study; MRC framework; nursing; patient participation; research protocol; INDIVIDUALIZED CARE; SHORT-FORM; PERCEPTIONS; COMMUNICATION; VALIDITY; SBAR;
D O I
10.1111/jan.13154
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
AimTo evaluate the feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness of bedside shift reporting in a minimum of five interventions and five control wards. BackgroundHospitals continually improve their quality of care. Next to improvements in clinical performance, more patient participation is stimulated through different methods. Methods to enhance patient participation such as bedside shift reporting lack rigorously performed research to determine their feasibility, appropriateness, meaningfulness and effectiveness. Small-scale research and a previous pilot study indicate that bedside shift reporting improves patient participation, nurse-nurse communication and nurse-patient communication. DesignThe development, implementation and evaluation of bedside shift report are based on the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions in health care. A matched, controlled, mixed-method, longitudinal study design will be used. The Feasibility-Appropriateness-Meaningfulness-Effectiveness framework will be applied for the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of bedside shift report. MethodsA tailored intervention and implementation process for bedside shift report will be developed using diagnostic interviews, co-design and acceptability testing. The intervention will be evaluated before implementation and three times after implementation. Individual and focus group interviews will be performed. Questionnaires, observations and analysis of the medical records and administrative databases will be completed. This study was funded in October 2015. Research Ethics Committee approval was granted in March 2016. DiscussionThere is a pressing need for rigorous research into the effects of interventions for improving patient participation. This study addresses the significance of bedside shift report as an intervention to improve quality of care, communication and patient participation within a large-scale, matched, controlled research design.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 494
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Anderson Cherri D, 2006, Nurs Adm Q, V30, P112
[2]  
Angus Jan, 2003, Nurs Inq, V10, P218, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00193.x
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, DEV EVALUATING COMPL
[5]  
[Anonymous], EVIDENCE BASED CLIN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Process Evaluation for Complex Interventions
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2022, ESSENTIALS NURSING R
[8]  
[Anonymous], IMPACT NURSE TO NURS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick reference guide
[10]  
[Anonymous], J CLIN NURSING