Student perceptions of online active learning practices and online learning climate predict online course engagement

被引:86
作者
Cole, Andrew W. [1 ]
Lennon, Lauren [1 ]
Weber, Nicole L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Learning Technol Ctr, Instruct Commun & Informat Technol Dept, Whitewater, WI 53190 USA
关键词
Course delivery formats; learner-centered; online course communication; online student collaboration; online student success; TEACHER CONFIRMATION; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1080/10494820.2019.1619593
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Student engagement in online courses may be more ambiguous, and complex to understand than in face-to-face (FtF) classrooms settings. Without regular FtF interaction, instructors may feel unable to accurately gauge student engagement, and respond accordingly. This research explored student perceptions of online active learning practices (Koohang, Paliszkiewicz, Nord, & Ramim, 2014, Advancing a theoretical model for knowledge construction in e-learning. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2, 12-25), student uncertainty about social belonging in college (Walton & Cohen, 2011, A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331, 1447-1451. doi: 10.1126/science.1198364) and a course's online learning climate (Kaufmann, Sellnow, & Frisby, 2016, The development and validation of the online learning climate scale (OLCS). Communication Education, 65, 307-321. doi: 10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778), as potential predictors of online student engagement. Results from hierarchical multiple regression models provide evidence of the predictive potential for these elements on online student engagement. Some possible evidence for the predictive potential of student GPA and age is provided as well. Implications of these findings, and future research opportunities are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:866 / 880
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Ahlfeldt S., 2005, High. Educ. Res. Dev., V24, P5, DOI [10.1080/0729436052000318541, DOI 10.1080/0729436052000318541]
[2]  
Allen I.E., 2016, Online Report Card: Tracking Online Education in the United States
[3]  
Allen M., 2019, Handbook of distance education, V4th, P122, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315296135
[4]  
Allen M.R., 2009, QUANTITATIVE RES COM
[5]   It's not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms [J].
Baepler, Paul ;
Walker, J. D. ;
Driessen, Michelle .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2014, 78 :227-236
[6]  
Brown M, 2017, INVENTING AGENCY: ESSAYS ON THE LITERARY AND PHILOSOPHICAL PRODUCTION OF THE MODERN SUBJECT, P17
[7]   Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: a two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance [J].
Chiu, Pit Ho Patrio ;
Cheng, Shuk Han .
HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 36 (02) :269-279
[8]  
Coates H., 2007, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, V32, P121, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02602930600801878, 10.1080/02602930600801878]
[9]   Testing the Impact of Student Preference for Face-to-Face Communication on Online Course Satisfaction [J].
Cole, Andrew W. .
WESTERN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2016, 80 (05) :619-637
[10]  
Cole AW, 2017, ONLINE LEARN, V21, P245