A semi-supervised learning approach towards automatic wireless technology recognition

被引:16
作者
Camelo, Miguel [1 ]
Shahid, Adnan [2 ]
Fontaine, Jaron [2 ]
de Figueiredo, Felipe Augusto Pereira [2 ]
De Poorter, Eli [2 ]
Moerman, Ingrid [2 ]
Latre, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Dept Math & Comp Sci, Imec IDLab, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, Imec IDLab, Dept Informat Technol, Ghent, Belgium
来源
2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DYNAMIC SPECTRUM ACCESS NETWORKS (DYSPAN) | 2019年
关键词
wireless technology recognition; semi-supervised learning; deep learning; neural network; deep autoencoders; SIGNAL IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1109/dyspan.2019.8935690
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Radio spectrum has become a scarce commodity due to the advent of several non-collaborative radio technologies that share the same spectrum. Recognizing a radio technology that accesses the spectrum is fundamental to define spectrum management policies to mitigate interference. State-of-the-art approaches for technology recognition using machine learning are based on supervised learning, which requires an extensive labeled data set to perform well. However, if the technologies and their environment are entirely unknown, the labeling task becomes time-consuming and challenging. In this work, we present a Semi supervised Learning (SSL) approach for technology recognition that exploits the capabilities of modern Software Defined Radios (SDRs) to build large unlabeled data sets of IQ samples but requires only a few of them to be labeled to start the learning process. The proposed approach is implemented using a Deep Autoencoder, and the comparison is carried out against a Supervised Learning (SL) approach using Deep Neural Network (DNN). Using the DARPA Colosseum test bed, we created an IQ sample data set of 16 unknown radio technologies and obtain a classification accuracy of > 97% using the entire labeled data set using both approaches. However, the proposed SSL approach achieves a classification accuracy of >= 70% while using only 10% of the labeled data. This performance is equivalent to 4.6x times better classification accuracy than the DNN using the same reduced labeled data set. More importantly, the proposed approach is more robust than the DNN under corrupted input, e.g., noisy signals, which gives us to 2x and 3x better accuracy at Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of -5 dB and 0 dB, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 429
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Abadi M., 2015, TENSORFLOW LARGE SCA
[2]   Second-Order Cyclostationarity of Mobile WiMAX and LTE OFDM Signals and Application to Spectrum Awareness in Cognitive Radio Systems [J].
Al-Habashna, Ala'a ;
Dobre, Octavia A. ;
Venkatesan, Ramachandran ;
Popescu, Dimitrie C. .
IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2012, 6 (01) :26-42
[3]  
Alain G, 2014, J MACH LEARN RES, V15, P3563
[4]   Central suboptimal H∞ filter design for linear time-varying systems with state delay [J].
Basin, Michael ;
Shi, Peng ;
Calderon-Alvarez, Dario ;
Wang, Jianfei .
2008 AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-12, 2008, :1-+
[5]  
Bengio P., 2006, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 (NIPS06), P153, DOI DOI 10.5555/2976456.2976476
[6]   Wireless Technology Identification Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks [J].
Bitar, Naim ;
Muhammad, Siraj ;
Refai, Hazem H. .
2017 IEEE 28TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PERSONAL, INDOOR, AND MOBILE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS (PIMRC), 2017,
[7]   A Survey on Machine-Learning Techniques in Cognitive Radios [J].
Bkassiny, Mario ;
Li, Yang ;
Jayaweera, Sudharman K. .
IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2013, 15 (03) :1136-1159
[8]   Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learning [J].
Bottou, Leon ;
Curtis, Frank E. ;
Nocedal, Jorge .
SIAM REVIEW, 2018, 60 (02) :223-311
[9]  
Bouzegzi A., 2008, 2008 IEEE 19 INT S P, P1
[10]  
Chapelle Olivier, 2010, Semi-Supervised Learning