Assessing dose-dependent differences in DNA-damage, p53 response and genotoxicity for quercetin and curcumin

被引:29
|
作者
Sun, Bin [1 ]
Ross, Susan M. [1 ]
Trask, O. Joseph [1 ]
Carmichael, Paul L. [2 ]
Dent, Matthew [2 ]
White, Andrew [2 ]
Andersen, Melvin E. [1 ]
Clewell, Rebecca A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamner Inst Hlth Sci, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27709 USA
[2] Unilever, Safety & Environm Assurance Ctr, Sharnbrook MK44 1LQ, Beds, England
关键词
DNA damage; Polyphenols; Micronucleus; p53; Quercetin; Curcumin; DNA repair; CELL-CYCLE ARREST; BREAST-CANCER CELLS; P53-DEPENDENT APOPTOSIS; FLAVONOID QUERCETIN; MICRONUCLEUS ASSAY; CARCINOMA-CELLS; HISTONE H2AX; INHIBITION; ACTIVATION; EXPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tiv.2013.05.015
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
As part of a longer-term goal to create a quantitative mechanistic model of the p53-Mdm2 DNA-damage pathway, we are studying cellular responses to compounds causing DNA-damage by various modes-of action, including two natural polyphenols: quercetin (QUE) and curcumin (CUR). QUE and CUR are weak mutagens in some in vitro assays and possess both anti- or pro-oxidant effects depending on dose. This study examines the dose-response of DNA-damage pathway to these compounds in HT1080 cells (a human cell line with wild-type p53) at doses relevant to human exposure. CUR was more potent in causing reactive oxygen species, DNA damage (measured as phospho-H2AX) and p53 induction, with lowest observed effect levels (LOELs; 3-8 mu M) approximately three-fold lower than QUE (20-30 mu M). CUR showed a strong G2/M arrest and apoptosis at similar to 10 mu M. QUE caused S phase arrest at low doses (8 mu M) and apoptosis was only induced at much higher doses (60 mu M). At concentrations with similar levels of p-H2AX and p53 biomarkers, CUR caused greater micronuclei frequency. CUR induced clear increases micronuclei at 3-6 mu M, while QUE had a weaker micronuclei response even at the highest doses. Thus, even with two compounds sharing common chemistries, DNA-damage response patterns differed significantly in terms of dose and cell fate. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1877 / 1887
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Attenuation of the p53 response to DNA damage by high cell density
    Bar, J
    Cohen-Noyman, E
    Geiger, B
    Oren, M
    ONCOGENE, 2004, 23 (12) : 2128 - 2137
  • [32] Attenuation of the p53 response to DNA damage by high cell density
    Jair Bar
    Efrat Cohen-Noyman
    Benjamin Geiger
    Moshe Oren
    Oncogene, 2004, 23 : 2128 - 2137
  • [33] Dynamics of P53 in response to DNA damage: Mathematical modeling and perspective
    Sun, Tingzhe
    Cui, Jun
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2015, 119 (02) : 175 - 182
  • [34] Mathematical modelling of p53 basal dynamics and DNA damage response
    Chong, Ket Hing
    Samarasinghe, Sandhya
    Kulasiri, Don
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2015, 259 : 27 - 42
  • [35] p53 binding to the p21 promoter is dependent on the nature of DNA damage
    Hill, Richard
    Bodzak, Ewelina
    Blough, Michael D.
    Lee, Patrick W. K.
    CELL CYCLE, 2008, 7 (16) : 2535 - 2543
  • [36] A plausible model for bimodal p53 switch in DNA damage response
    Sun, Tingzhe
    Cui, Jun
    FEBS LETTERS, 2014, 588 (05) : 815 - 821
  • [37] Positive effect of Mdm2 on p53 expression explains excitability of p53 in response to DNA damage
    Elias, Jan
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2017, 418 : 94 - 104
  • [38] The WRAP53α gene undergoes p53 tumor suppressor-dependent transcriptional regulation in response to DNA damage
    Moxley, Anne Hucks
    Reisman, David
    GENE REPORTS, 2022, 26
  • [39] Modifications of p53 and the DNA Damage Response in Cells Expressing Mutant Form of the Protein Huntingtin
    Illuzzi, Jennifer L.
    Vickers, Cassie A.
    Kmiec, Eric B.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE, 2011, 45 (02) : 256 - 268
  • [40] Elevated transcription of the p53 gene in early S-phase leads to a rapid DNA-damage response during S-phase of the cell cycle
    Takahashi, Paula
    Polson, Amanda
    Reisman, David
    APOPTOSIS, 2011, 16 (09) : 950 - 958