Shared Decision-Making in the Selection of Outpatient Analgesics for Older Individuals in the Emergency Department

被引:29
作者
Isaacs, Cameron G. [1 ]
Kistler, Christine [2 ]
Hunold, Katherine M. [3 ]
Pereira, Greg F. [4 ]
Buchbinder, Mara [5 ]
Weaver, Mark A. [6 ]
McLean, Samuel A. [4 ,7 ]
Platts-Mills, Timothy F. [4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Dept Family Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Biostat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Anesthesiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Dept Social Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Univ N Carolina, Dept Emergency Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
geriatrics; pain; emergency medicine; decision-making; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; OPIOID TREATMENT; PAIN MEDICATION; PRIMARY-CARE; PHYSICIANS; OUTCOMES; PATIENT; ADULTS; PREFERENCES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/jgs.12207
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the relationship between older adults' perceptions of shared decision-making in the selection of an analgesic to take at home for acute musculoskeletal pain and (1) patient satisfaction with the analgesic and (2) changes in pain scores at 1week. Design Cross-sectional study. Setting Single academic emergency department. Participants Individuals aged 65 and older with acute musculoskeletal pain. Measurements Two components of shared decision-making were assessed: information provided to the patient about the medication choice and patient participation in the selection of the analgesic. Optimal satisfaction with the analgesic was defined as being a lot satisfied. Pain scores were assessed in the ED and at 1week using a 0-to-10 scale. Results Of 159 individuals reached by telephone, 111 met all eligibility criteria and completed the survey. Fifty-two percent of participants reported receiving information about pain medication options, and 31% reported participating in analgesic selection. Participants who received information were more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the pain medication than those who did not (67% vs 34%; P<.001). Participants who participated in the decision were also more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the analgesic (71% vs 43%; P=.008) and had a greater average decrease in pain score (4.1 vs 2.9; P=.05). After adjusting for measured confounders, participants who reported receiving information remained more likely to report optimal satisfaction with the analgesic (63% vs 38%; P=.04). Conclusion Shared decision-making in analgesic selection for older adults with acute musculoskeletal pain may improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 798
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Impact of the physician's participatory style in asthma outcomes and patient satisfaction [J].
Adams, RJ ;
Smith, BJ ;
Ruffin, RE .
ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :263-271
[2]   Shared Decision Making Informing and Involving Patients to Do the Right Thing in Health Care [J].
Barry, Michael J. .
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 35 (02) :90-98
[3]   Stated Preferences of Physicians and Chronic Pain Sufferers in the Use of Classic Strong Opioids [J].
Chancellor, Jeremy ;
Martin, Monique ;
Liedgens, Hiltrud ;
Baker, Mary G. ;
Mueller-Schwefe, Gerhard H. H. .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (01) :106-117
[4]   Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango) [J].
Charles, C ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, T .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 44 (05) :681-692
[5]   VALIDATION OF A COMBINED COMORBIDITY INDEX [J].
CHARLSON, M ;
SZATROWSKI, TP ;
PETERSON, J ;
GOLD, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (11) :1245-1251
[6]   Gender disparity in analgesic treatment of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain [J].
Chen, Esther H. ;
Shofer, Frances S. ;
Dean, Anthony J. ;
Hollander, Judd E. ;
Baxt, William G. ;
Robey, Jennifer L. ;
Sease, Keara L. ;
Mills, Angela M. .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2008, 15 (05) :414-418
[7]   Who receives opioids for acute pain in emergency departments? Considering evidence, patient and provider preferences [J].
Fanciullo, Gilbert J. .
PAIN, 2012, 153 (05) :941-942
[8]   Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test [J].
Frosch, DL ;
Kaplan, RM ;
Felitti, V .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 16 (06) :391-398
[9]   EXPANDING PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN CARE - EFFECTS ON PATIENT OUTCOMES [J].
GREENFIELD, S ;
KAPLAN, S ;
WARE, JE .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1985, 102 (04) :520-528
[10]   Importance of Side Effects in Opioid Treatment A Trade-Off Analysis With Patients and Physicians [J].
Gregorian, Razmic S., Jr. ;
Gasik, Alexander ;
Kwong, Winghan Jacqueline ;
Voeller, Simon ;
Kavanagh, Shane .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2010, 11 (11) :1095-1108