Pushover analysis of unreinforced irregular masonry buildings: Lessons from different modeling approaches

被引:56
作者
Asikoglu, Abide [1 ]
Vasconcelos, Graca [1 ]
Lourenco, Paulo B. [1 ]
Panto, Bartolomeo [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minho, Dept Civil Engn, ISISE, P-4800058 Azurem, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Imperial Coll London, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Unreinforced masonry; Nonlinear static analysis; Macro-element model; Equivalent frame model; Finite element methods; SEISMIC PERFORMANCE; STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT; LIMIT ANALYSIS; BEHAVIOR; INPLANE; TESTS; VALIDATION; SIMULATION; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110830
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present paper addresses the seismic performance of a half-scale two-story unreinforced masonry (URM) building with structural irregularity in plan and in elevation. The main objectives are (i) to understand the seismic response of URM buildings with torsional effects, and (ii) to evaluate the reliability of using simplified approaches for irregular masonry buildings. For this purpose, nonlinear static analyses are carried out by using three different modeling approaches, based on a continuum model, beam-based and spring-based macro-element models. The performance of each approach was compared based on capacity curves and global damage patterns. Reasonable agreement was found between numerical predictions and experimental observations. Validation of simplified approaches was generally provided with reference to regular structures but, based on the differences in the base shear capacity found here, it appears that structural irregularities are important to be taken into account for acquiring higher accuracy on simplified methods when torsion is present.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 85 条
[71]   A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings [J].
Penna, Andrea ;
Lagomarsino, Sergio ;
Galasco, Alessandro .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2014, 43 (02) :159-179
[72]   Influence of boundary conditions and size effect on the drift capacity of URM walls [J].
Petry, Sarah ;
Beyer, Katrin .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 65 :76-88
[73]   Limit analysis of 3D masonry block structures with non-associative frictional joints using cone programming [J].
Portioli, F. ;
Casapulla, C. ;
Gilbert, M. ;
Cascini, L. .
COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2014, 143 :108-121
[74]  
Priestley MJN, 2005, NZSEE C, DOI [10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00048-7., DOI 10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00048-7]
[75]   Diagnosis and Seismic Behavior Evaluation of the Church of SAo Miguel de Refojos (Portugal) [J].
Ramirez, Rafael ;
Mendes, Nuno ;
Lourenco, Paulo B. .
BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (06)
[76]   Seismic performance of URM buildings with in-plane non-stiffened and stiffened timber floors [J].
Scotta, Roberto ;
Trutalli, Davide ;
Marchi, Luca ;
Pozza, Luca .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 167 :683-694
[77]   Analysis of the performance in the linear field of Equivalent-Frame Models for regular and irregular masonry walls [J].
Siano, Rossella ;
Sepe, Vincenzo ;
Camata, Guido ;
Spacone, Enrico ;
Roca, Pere ;
Pela, Luca .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2017, 145 :190-210
[78]   Numerical homogenization-based seismic assessment of an English-bond masonry prototype: Structural level application [J].
Silva, Luis C. ;
Lourenco, Paulo B. ;
Milani, Gabriele .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2020, 49 (09) :841-862
[79]   Seismic Structural Assessment of the Christchurch Catholic Basilica, New Zealand [J].
Silva, Luis C. ;
Mendes, Nuno ;
Lourenco, Paulo B. ;
Ingham, Jason .
STRUCTURES, 2018, 15 :115-130
[80]  
Simoes A. R. P., 2018, THESIS