Association Between the Functional Movement Screen and Landing Kinematics in Individuals With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to compare functional movement screen (FMS) scores and drop vertical jump (DVJ) kinematics between those with and without anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), and to evaluate the association between FMS composite score and DVJ kinematics. Design: Cross-sectional. Participants: Sixty individuals with and without a history of ACLR. Main Outcome Measures: Composite FMS score and the dorsiflexion, knee -flexion, hip -flexion, knee abduction, hip adduction, and trunk -flexion angles during a DVJ. Results: The FMS scores did not differ between groups (P> .05). There were smaller peak and initial contact hip -flexion angles in the ACLR and contralateral limbs compared with controls, and smaller peak dorsiflexion angles in the ACLR compared with contralateral limbs (P < .05). Lower FMS score was associated with a smaller peak dorsiflexion angle, smaller peak knee -flexion angle, and larger peak knee abduction angle in the ACLR limb (Delta R2 = .14-.23); a smaller peak dorsiflexion angle and smaller peak knee -flexion angle in the contralateral limb (Delta R2 = .17-.19); and a smaller peak dorsiflexion angle, smaller peak knee -flexion angle, and larger peak knee abduction angle in the control limb (Delta R2 = .16-.22). Conclusion: The FMS scores did not differ between groups, but were associated with DVJ kinematics and should be a complementary rather than substitute assessment.