Convexity in scientific collaboration networks

被引:19
作者
Subelj, Lovro [1 ]
Fiala, Dalibor [2 ]
Ciglaric, Tadej [1 ]
Kronegger, Luka [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Comp & Informat Sci, Vecna Pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ West Bohemia, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Univ 8, Plzen 30614, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Social Sci, Kardeljeva Ploscad 5, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Convexity; Co-authorship; Convex skeletons; Centrality; Weak links; CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; COAUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; SOCIAL NETWORK; IMPACT; EVOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; CENTRALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Convexity in a network (graph) has been recently defined as a property of each of its subgraphs to include all shortest paths between the nodes of that subgraph. It can be measured on the scale [0, 1] with 1 being assigned to fully convex networks. The largest convex component of a graph that emerges after the removal of the least number of edges is called a convex skeleton. It is basically a tree of cliques, which has been shown to have many interesting features. In this article the notions of convexity and convex skeletons in the context of scientific collaboration networks are discussed. More specifically, we analyze the co-authorship networks of Slovenian researchers in computer science, physics, sociology, mathematics, and economics and extract convex skeletons from them. We then compare these convex skeletons with the residual graphs (remainders) in terms of collaboration frequency distributions by various parameters such as the publication year and type, coauthors' birth year, status, gender, discipline, etc. We also show the top-ranked scientists by four basic centrality measures as calculated on the original networks and their skeletons and conclude that convex skeletons may help detect influential scholars that are hardly identifiable in the original collaboration network. As their inherent feature, convex skeletons retain the properties of collaboration networks. These include high-level structural properties but also the fact that the same authors are highlighted by centrality measures. Moreover, the most important ties and thus the most important collaborations are retained in the skeletons. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 31
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY AND SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION [J].
KATZ, JS .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 1994, 31 (01) :31-43
[22]   What is research collaboration? [J].
Katz, JS ;
Martin, BR .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1997, 26 (01) :1-18
[23]   Distortive Effects of Initial-Based Name Disambiguation on Measurements of Large-Scale Coauthorship Networks [J].
Kim, Jinseok ;
Diesner, Jana .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 67 (06) :1446-1461
[24]   The effect of data pre-processing on understanding the evolution of collaboration networks [J].
Kim, Jinseok ;
Diesner, Jana .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2015, 9 (01) :226-236
[25]  
Kim J, 2017, SCI REP-UK, V7, DOI [10.1038/s41598-017-03492-4, 10.1038/srep39768, 10.1007/s13278-017-0428-3]
[26]   Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web [J].
Kretschmer, H .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) :409-420
[27]   Motifs in co-authorship networks and their relation to the impact of scientific publications [J].
Krumov, L. ;
Fretter, C. ;
Mueller-Hannemann, M. ;
Weihe, K. ;
Huett, M. -T. .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B, 2011, 84 (04) :535-540
[28]   Research collaboration networks of two OIC nations: comparative study between Turkey and Malaysia in the field of 'Energy Fuels', 2009-2011 [J].
Kumar, Sameer ;
Jan, Jariah Mohd. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 98 (01) :387-414
[29]   What do we measure by co-authorships? [J].
Laudel, G .
RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2002, 11 (01) :3-15
[30]   Collaboration patterns in the German political science co-authorship network [J].
Leifeld, Philip ;
Wankmueller, Sandra ;
Berger, Valentin T. Z. ;
Ingold, Karin ;
Steiner, Christiane .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (04)