Convexity in scientific collaboration networks

被引:17
作者
Subelj, Lovro [1 ]
Fiala, Dalibor [2 ]
Ciglaric, Tadej [1 ]
Kronegger, Luka [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Comp & Informat Sci, Vecna Pot 113, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
[2] Univ West Bohemia, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Univ 8, Plzen 30614, Czech Republic
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Social Sci, Kardeljeva Ploscad 5, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
Convexity; Co-authorship; Convex skeletons; Centrality; Weak links; CO-AUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; COAUTHORSHIP NETWORKS; SOCIAL NETWORK; IMPACT; EVOLUTION; PERFORMANCE; CENTRALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.joi.2018.11.005
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Convexity in a network (graph) has been recently defined as a property of each of its subgraphs to include all shortest paths between the nodes of that subgraph. It can be measured on the scale [0, 1] with 1 being assigned to fully convex networks. The largest convex component of a graph that emerges after the removal of the least number of edges is called a convex skeleton. It is basically a tree of cliques, which has been shown to have many interesting features. In this article the notions of convexity and convex skeletons in the context of scientific collaboration networks are discussed. More specifically, we analyze the co-authorship networks of Slovenian researchers in computer science, physics, sociology, mathematics, and economics and extract convex skeletons from them. We then compare these convex skeletons with the residual graphs (remainders) in terms of collaboration frequency distributions by various parameters such as the publication year and type, coauthors' birth year, status, gender, discipline, etc. We also show the top-ranked scientists by four basic centrality measures as calculated on the original networks and their skeletons and conclude that convex skeletons may help detect influential scholars that are hardly identifiable in the original collaboration network. As their inherent feature, convex skeletons retain the properties of collaboration networks. These include high-level structural properties but also the fact that the same authors are highlighted by centrality measures. Moreover, the most important ties and thus the most important collaborations are retained in the skeletons. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 31
页数:22
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Hossain, Liaquat ;
Leydesdorff, Loet .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2012, 6 (03) :403-412
[2]   Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures [J].
Abbasi, Alireza ;
Altmann, Joern ;
Hossain, Liaquat .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (04) :594-607
[3]   LGL: Creating a map of protein function with an algorithm for visualizing very large biological networks [J].
Adai, AT ;
Date, SV ;
Wieland, S ;
Marcotte, EM .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 340 (01) :179-190
[4]  
[Anonymous], CONVEX SKELETON
[5]   Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Jeong, H ;
Néda, Z ;
Ravasz, E ;
Schubert, A ;
Vicsek, T .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2002, 311 (3-4) :590-614
[6]   An analysis of international coauthorship networks in the supply chain analytics research area [J].
Barbosa, Marcelo Werneck ;
Ladeira, Marcelo Bronzo ;
de la Calle Vicente, Alberto .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2017, 111 (03) :1703-1731
[7]  
Bozeman B., 2014, Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda
[8]  
Brandao M. A., 2017, J BRAZILIAN COMPUTER, V23
[9]   Research impact in co-authorship networks: a two-mode analysis [J].
Dehdarirad, Tahereh ;
Nasini, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (02) :371-388
[10]   Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks [J].
Ding, Ying .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2011, 5 (01) :187-203