Contrast-to-noise ratio difference in small field of view cone beam computed tomography machines

被引:66
作者
Bechara, Boulos [1 ]
McMahan, Clyde A. [2 ]
Moore, William S. [1 ]
Noujeim, Marcel [1 ]
Geha, Hassem [1 ]
Teixeira, Fabricio B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Radiol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[2] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Pathol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Endodont, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
cone beam computed tomography; noise; contrast;
D O I
10.2334/josnusd.54.227
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Each of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines offer a small field of view (FOV); Promax, Accuitomo 3D, and Kodak 9000. The objectives were to determine, when using a small FOV, the difference in contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) of images obtained from different machines and different scan settings within each machine. A phantom made of a dry mandible with an epoxy resin based substitute (ERBS) block was used. The ERBS block was fixed to the lingual cortex in the posterior left mandible. Water was used to simulate soft tissue. Twenty scans were acquired. CNR was calculated as the difference in density of the ERBS block and a control area divided by the standard deviation of the difference. The CNR obtained from images acquired with the Promax machine (voxel size of 0.2 mm) was higher than the other machines (voxel sizes 0.076, 0.08, or 0.125 mm) when using a small FOV. The Accuitomo 360 scan had higher CNR than the Accuitomo 180 scan due to the doubling of the number of basis images acquired. Smaller voxel size does not necessarily lead to enhanced CNR. Increasing the number of basis images did increase the CNR.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 232
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Applied Regression Analysis
[2]   Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use [J].
Arai, Y ;
Tammisalo, E ;
Iwai, K ;
Hashimoto, K ;
Shinoda, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (04) :245-248
[3]   Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions [J].
Bauman, R. ;
Scarfe, W. ;
Clark, S. ;
Morelli, J. ;
Scheetz, J. ;
Farman, A. .
INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL, 2011, 44 (08) :752-758
[4]   Evaluation of a cone beam CT artefact reduction algorithm [J].
Bechara, B. ;
McMahan, C. A. ;
Geha, H. ;
Noujeim, M. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (05) :422-428
[5]   Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study [J].
Bechara, B. B. ;
Moore, W. S. ;
McMahan, C. A. ;
Noujeim, M. .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 41 (03) :248-253
[6]  
Chen Quan, 2009, Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi, V44, P217
[7]   Flapless, CBCT-guided osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous implant installation. I: radiographic examination and surgical technique. A prospective 1-year follow-up [J].
Fornell, Jan ;
Johansson, Lars-Ake ;
Bolin, Anders ;
Isaksson, Sten ;
Sennerby, Lars .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (01) :28-34
[8]   Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography [J].
Ghaeminia, H. ;
Meijer, G. J. ;
Soehardi, A. ;
Borstlap, W. A. ;
Mulder, J. ;
Berge, S. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 38 (09) :964-971
[9]  
Grimard BA, 2009, J PERIODONTOL, V80, P48, DOI [10.1902/jop.2009.080289, 10.1902/jop.2009.080289 ]
[10]   Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: A preliminary report [J].
Hamada, Y ;
Kondoh, T ;
Noguchi, K ;
Iino, M ;
Isono, H ;
Ishii, H ;
Mishima, A ;
Kobayashi, K ;
Seto, I .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2005, 42 (02) :128-137